Hi Ben,
> Sorry, tonight has been time-shifted. I'll have a look today.
Any news?
Regards,
Mark
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Sou
Mark Jonas wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
>
>> I'll have a look at it tonight. Your hard work is appreciated and is
>> worth it. In the case of these chips, there's no reason for using
>> SMSC's drivers verbatim because the chips are well documented and
>> commonly used. Thanks for doing this!
>>
Hi Ben,
> I'll have a look at it tonight. Your hard work is appreciated and is
> worth it. In the case of these chips, there's no reason for using
> SMSC's drivers verbatim because the chips are well documented and
> commonly used. Thanks for doing this!
Did the driver find your appreciati
Hi Mark,
Mark Jonas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the attached patch replaces the patch I sent before. I came to the the
> conclusion that making SMSC's driver comply to the U-Boot coding style
> would be the right thing because SMSC will most likely not update
> their driver very often. I hope the driver i
Hello,
the attached patch replaces the patch I sent before. I came to the the
conclusion that making SMSC's driver comply to the U-Boot coding style
would be the right thing because SMSC will most likely not update
their driver very often. I hope the driver is now compliant enough. It
was really a
