In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Of course, we could put them into the TQ custodian tree.
> > Awkward, that I forgot this.
>
> So I'm assuming I need take no u-boot-arm actions
But please do. It's ARM specific code, and needs to be reviewed and
confirmed by an independent ARM exp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Jens Gehrlein schrieb:
>
> > Who will pick up this patch series (if there are no complaints)? Peter?
>
> Of course, we could put them into the TQ custodian tree.
> Awkward, that I forgot this.
But it still has to go through the respective custodian.
B
Hi,
Jens Gehrlein skrev:
> Hi,
>
> the following patches introduce the i.MX31 (ARM1136) based board TQMA31.
> Used toolchain was ELDK 4.1.
>
> The first three patches fix some bugs in mxc/mx31 common parts. I compiled
> the im31_phycore, the imx31_litekit and the mx31ads U-Boots for this.
> But
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Jens Gehrlein
> Sent: 04 July 2008 16:02
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 00/10] [ARM] TQMA31: new board
>
> Jens Gehrle
Jens Gehrlein schrieb:
> Who will pick up this patch series (if there are no complaints)? Peter?
Of course, we could put them into the TQ custodian tree.
Awkward, that I forgot this.
Kind regards,
Jens
-
Sponsored by: Sourc
Hi,
the following patches introduce the i.MX31 (ARM1136) based board TQMA31.
Used toolchain was ELDK 4.1.
The first three patches fix some bugs in mxc/mx31 common parts. I compiled
the im31_phycore, the imx31_litekit and the mx31ads U-Boots for this.
But I don't have boards to test them.
Patch 0
