In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> When doing the AT91CAP9/AT91SAM9 port, a number of header files were
> copied from the Linux kernel sources. This patch explicitly specifies
> this origin for all the copied headers, and for those missing copyright
> information, adds it.
>
> Additionaly
On 10:57 Fri 09 May , Stelian Pop wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 08 mai 2008 à 23:26 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a
> écrit :
>
> > > +#include
> > Is not supposed to br
> > #include
>
> Argl, of course it is supposed to be at91sam9_smc. I seen this typo in
> the patch before sending it,
Le jeudi 08 mai 2008 à 23:26 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a
écrit :
> > +#include
> Is not supposed to br
> #include
Argl, of course it is supposed to be at91sam9_smc. I seen this typo in
the patch before sending it, corrected it, did a test build, and somehow
managed to send the w
On 22:52 Thu 08 May , Stelian Pop wrote:
> When doing the AT91CAP9/AT91SAM9 port, a number of header files were
> copied from the Linux kernel sources. This patch explicitly specifies
> this origin for all the copied headers, and for those missing copyright
> information, adds it.
>
> Addition
When doing the AT91CAP9/AT91SAM9 port, a number of header files were
copied from the Linux kernel sources. This patch explicitly specifies
this origin for all the copied headers, and for those missing copyright
information, adds it.
Additionaly, the header file 'at91sam926x_mc.h' has been supercee
