Le vendredi 18 janvier 2008 à 09:45 +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen a écrit :
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:38:17 +0100
> Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/macb.c b/drivers/net/macb.c
[...]
> Cool, I always was curious about whether post-rm9200 AT91 chips could
> use thi
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:38:17 +0100
Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macb.c b/drivers/net/macb.c
> index 6657d22..9c98338 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macb.c
> @@ -417,10 +417,18 @@ static int macb_init(struct eth_device *netdev,
> bd_t *bd)
other parts of the patch.
diff --git a/CREDITS b/CREDITS
index 1130c9e..a07d842 100644
--- a/CREDITS
+++ b/CREDITS
@@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D: Support for the Wind River sbc405, sbc8240 board
W: http://www.windriver.com
+N: Stelian Pop
+E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+D: Atmel AT91CAP9A