Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] IDE: fix bug in reset sequence

2008-04-18 Thread Martin Krause
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > you wrote: > > According to the ata (ata5) specification the RESET- signal > > shall be asserted for at least 25 us. Without this patch, > > the RESET- signal is asserted on some boards for only < 1 us > > (e. g. on the TQM5200). This

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] IDE: fix bug in reset sequence

2008-04-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > According to the ata (ata5) specification the RESET- signal > shall be asserted for at least 25 us. Without this patch, > the RESET- signal is asserted on some boards for only < 1 us > (e. g. on the TQM5200). This patch adds a general delay of > 25 us to

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] IDE: fix bug in reset sequence

2008-04-04 Thread Martin Krause
According to the ata (ata5) specification the RESET- signal shall be asserted for at least 25 us. Without this patch, the RESET- signal is asserted on some boards for only < 1 us (e. g. on the TQM5200). This patch adds a general delay of 25 us to the RESET- signal. Without this patch a Platinum 4