On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:06:35 +0200 (CEST)
Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Appropriate or not from the esthetic PoV, I don't see another chance to
> make it useful - either make it run-time configurable either via command
> parameters, or environment varables, ot at least compi
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:20:22 +0200 (CEST)
> Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > + /* FIXME: Make these parameters configurable */
> > > + slave = spi_setup_slave(0, device, 100, SPI_MODE_0);
> >
> > Until it is configurabl
On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:20:22 +0200 (CEST)
Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > static int device;
> > static int bitlen;
> > static uchar dout[MAX_SPI_BYTES];
> > static uchar din[MAX_SPI_BYTES];
> > +static struct spi_slave *slave;
>
> Don't think this is needed...
Right
Hi Haavard,
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> diff --git a/common/cmd_spi.c b/common/cmd_spi.c
> index 7604422..b0e7db1 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_spi.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_spi.c
> @@ -38,19 +38,13 @@
> #endif
>
> /*
> - * External table of chip select functions (see the appropria
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 09 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> >> This patch hasn't been tested on all the boards involved, so there are
> >> probably a few issues. For now, I'd like some comments on the new
> >> interface -- if it l
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 09 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
>> This patch hasn't been tested on all the boards involved, so there are
>> probably a few issues. For now, I'd like some comments on the new
>> interface -- if it looks good, we should spend some additional effort
>> to vali
On Friday 09 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> This patch hasn't been tested on all the boards involved, so there are
> probably a few issues. For now, I'd like some comments on the new
> interface -- if it looks good, we should spend some additional effort
> to validate that it doesn't introdu
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch gets rid of the spi_chipsel table and adds a handful of new
functions that makes the SPI layer cleaner and more flexible.
Instead of the spi_chipsel table, each board that wants to use SPI
gets to implement three hooks:
* spi_cs_activate()
