Re: [U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing MAC addresses

2008-03-03 Thread Scott Wood
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote: > > > Looks like something that was introduced between 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc3; > > > does this mean that u-boot-1.3.2 will not be able to boot 834x > > > processors (networking that is) with kernels before 2.6.25? > > > > No, it just mean

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing MAC addresses

2008-03-01 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Marc Leeman wrote: >> I presume the problem is that the /aliases node doesn't exist in your >> tree (original kernel .dts source, and thus the .dtb blob). One simple >> solution would be to create the /aliases node if it doesn't exist, just >> like we create the /chosen node if it doesn't exist

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing MAC addresses

2008-03-01 Thread Marc Leeman
> I presume the problem is that the /aliases node doesn't exist in your > tree (original kernel .dts source, and thus the .dtb blob). One simple > solution would be to create the /aliases node if it doesn't exist, just > like we create the /chosen node if it doesn't exist. Yep, that's how I go

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing MAC addresses

2008-03-01 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Marc Leeman wrote: > When booting an 8347 processor, the MAC addresses (ethaddr and eth1addr) > don't seem to get passed anymore. > > I modified my config to include CONFIG_HAS_ETH0 and CONFIG_HAS_ETH1 and > I am entering the code in fdt_fixup_ethernet (common/fdt_support.c) but > get stuck at nod

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing MAC addresses

2008-03-01 Thread Marc Leeman
> > Looks like something that was introduced between 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc3; > > does this mean that u-boot-1.3.2 will not be able to boot 834x > > processors (networking that is) with kernels before 2.6.25? > > No, it just means you need the newer device tree. Of course, but since the device tree

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing MAC addresses

2008-02-29 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:49:08PM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote: > > turns up empty for the 2.6.24 kernels, looking for "aliases" in the > > kernel Documentation does not give a hit that seems relevant for device > > trees. > > > > and the only ref that seems to be on topic is: > > http://thread.gmane

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing MAC addresses

2008-02-29 Thread Marc Leeman
> turns up empty for the 2.6.24 kernels, looking for "aliases" in the > kernel Documentation does not give a hit that seems relevant for device > trees. > > and the only ref that seems to be on topic is: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/36004 Looks like something that was

[U-Boot-Users] 1.3.2-rc2 83xx CONFIG_HAS_ETHX not passing MAC addresses

2008-02-29 Thread Marc Leeman
When booting an 8347 processor, the MAC addresses (ethaddr and eth1addr) don't seem to get passed anymore. I modified my config to include CONFIG_HAS_ETH0 and CONFIG_HAS_ETH1 and I am entering the code in fdt_fixup_ethernet (common/fdt_support.c) but get stuck at node = fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/alia