On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:58:27 +0100
"Ulf Samuelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks OK to me, but I never used "call cc-option".
cc-option will try to run the compiler with the option. If the compiler
didn't complain, it evaluates to the option. If it failed, it evaluates
to nothing.
Very use
> ---snip---
>
>> >
>> > My postion remains that U-Boot is supplied to build with the latest
>> > ELDK toolchain.
>> > Supporting all possible toolchains (and all possible builds of those
>> > toolchains)
>> > is too much effort.
>>
>> Since I have already implemented a fix in my private U-boot
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:33:47 +0100
> "Ulf Samuelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In this case, reality and the map differs.
>> NWFPE toolchains built by cross-tool, buildroot, and www.gnuarm.com
>> not sure abnout the last) all bombs when they reach the "-msoft-float"
>
> You mean they don
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:33:47 +0100
"Ulf Samuelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this case, reality and the map differs.
> NWFPE toolchains built by cross-tool, buildroot, and www.gnuarm.com
> not sure abnout the last) all bombs when they reach the "-msoft-float"
You mean they don't recognize
> -Original Message-
> From: Ulf Samuelsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 February 2008 00:40
> To: Peter Pearse
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM
> compiler options
>
---snip---
> >
> > My postion remains that
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> >> If so I'll put -msoft-float in all arm config.mk files.
>>
>> Please DON'T!
>> This *forces* you to compile U-Boot with a compiler suite which is
>> configured to generate soft-float.
>
> I think this is not correct. Even if your compiler is n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> >> If so I'll put -msoft-float in all arm config.mk files.
>
> Please DON'T!
> This *forces* you to compile U-Boot with a compiler suite which is
> configured to generate soft-float.
I think this is not correct. Even if your compiler is not configure
>> >
>> > Please don't add too many empty lines.
>> >
>>
>> OK - I'll change thie when I re-submit.
>> I just like to be able to ripple thru my buffers to animate
>> the differences between almost identical files.
>>
>> > Why exactly are you dropping -msoft-float here?
>>
>> I was under the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:20:18 -
> "Peter Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The use of floating point arithmetic in the U-Boot code is
> > > deprecated.
>
> I'd say it's more than deprecated -- we shouldn't be using floating
> point arithmet
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:20:18 -
"Peter Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The use of floating point arithmetic in the U-Boot code is
> > deprecated.
I'd say it's more than deprecated -- we shouldn't be using floating
point arithmetic at all in u-boot. IMNSHO.
Haavard
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Pearse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 February 2008 13:59
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM
> compiler options
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
11 matches
Mail list logo
