In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Poselenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/socrates/socrates.c | 13 +++--
> include/configs/socrates.h |3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied (wwith cleaned-up subject).
Best regards,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:31:09AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
> > What is the reason for doing this? Compiler issues? I see the direct
> > pointer addressing is used all over the 85xx code.
Either the compiler or the hardware could reorder direc
Hi Sergei,
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
> >> + if (gur->porpllsr & (1<<15)) {
> >
> > Please don't use pointer access for such SoC registers. in_be32() is
> > recommended here.
>
> What is the reason for doing this? Compiler issues? I see the direct
> pointer addressing is u
Hello Stefan,
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Poselenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>> board/socrates/socrates.c | 13 +++--
>> include/configs/socrates.h |3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Poselenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > board/socrates/socrates.c | 13 +++--
> > include/configs/socrates.h |3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Better subject
On Tuesday 27 May 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Poselenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/socrates/socrates.c | 13 +++--
> include/configs/socrates.h |3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/socrates/socrates.c b/boar
