In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If we go to date based versions. I'd prefer we keep year as 4 digits:
> >
> > v1.2008.10
> > v1.2009.01
>
>
> I agree, although doing that makes the third field look like a mo
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: U-Boot version numbering
To: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we go to date b
