Hi Harald,
Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
can do, even though I believe it is by far not the best tool to do so.
The problem is that I would have to use one local branch per feature
(i.e. lots of local branches that need to be kept in sync), and even
then any incremental
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Markus Klotzbücher wrote:
So is this really the preferred workflow? How are others dealing with
this? How to avoid commitlog pollution?
I never used quilt, but I believe stacked git (stgit) implements more or
less the same behavior on top of git.
Yes, and guilt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
can do, even though I believe it is by far not the best tool to do so.
The definition of the best tool depends on many things, including
previous experience and personal preferences.
The problem is that I would have to use one local branch per feature
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:30:03AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
New patch at the end of this mail!
Could you please start using git to prepare and send patches? That
would save me (and others) a lot of time.
can do, even though I believe it is
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:30:03AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
New patch at the end of this mail!
Could you please start using git to prepare and send patches? That
would save
