RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread Vance, Kathy
It is true that the sample is the first execution before the sorting takes place. Oracle DB dose the same thing. I was unsuccessfully trying to use sub-query in this case. Kathy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Woodward Sent:

RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread Nick Cipollina
What about SSELECT FILE FIRST 2? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:03 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] OK...Is there a wayUV ED DICT

RE: [U2] UV; RetrieVe's xml to Excel

2006-05-26 Thread Angelo Collazo
Adrian, So what would it take to post the solution (with code) for those of us who do not want to re-invent the wheel? Cheers, Angelo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian Merrall Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:01 PM To:

Re: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread Roger Glenfield
FIRST is a synonym for SAMPLE. And that example won't return the first two of the sorted file. The reccount item is a better way to go. Rog. Nick Cipollina wrote: What about SSELECT FILE FIRST 2? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread George Gallen
NOPE. Same thing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:25 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] OK...Is there a wayUV What about SSELECT FILE FIRST 2? Thanks, Nick

Re: [U2] FOLD can mutilate

2006-05-26 Thread john reid
Not sure how spaces enter into it, although I see that it yields the same in the following with or without spaces. j 0001 EXECUTE 'CT JMRBP TEST.FOLD' 0002 A = A B C D E F G H I 0003 CRT LEN(A) 0004 CRT 'A:':A 0005 B=FOLD(A,1) 0006 CRT 'LEN B:':LEN(B) 0007

RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread Brad Davis
Two selects can be faster than one...so, there's no need to worry about the number of selects. The Unidata optimization routines for multiple indexes are not always as fast a manually tuned, multiple selects... -Original Message- From: Vance, Kathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread Brian Leach
George Hmmm, how are your IDs ordered? Just wondering whether something along these lines might work... SELECT ID TO SLIST 0 FROM YourFile WHERE ID = (SELECT MIN(ID)+1 FROM YourFile) ORDER BY ID; Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread George Gallen
hmm. there's a new one. Yes, that did work. Thanks George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:03 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] OK...Is there a wayUV ED

RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread George Gallen
I wondered when SQL would come into this:) Only problem is that the filename has -'s in it, but I suppose I could always make a Q pointer. I'll have to try that later. Thanks George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Leach

RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread George Gallen
HMM. No. Now it's not working, It returns all ID's. I must have done something wrong. Seems it doesn't like to be used in the selecting stage, but will be happy to be used in the display stage. SSELECT file WITH RCNT 3 RCNT is setup as below except I didn't call it REC.COUNT -Original

Re: [U2] FOLD can mutilate

2006-05-26 Thread john reid
The easy answer is that it probably does a TRIM prior to the fold. Thus the all-spaces field becomes null, and the fold cannot work on a zero length field. And its not a problem, only a curiousity. I discovered it while looking for garbage in production records, making use of LES in order to

RE: [U2] U2 - MITS versus Informer

2006-05-26 Thread Chris Reeves
Hi Everyone - First, thanks for the kind words about Informer. Always great to hear customer experiences. A couple points: Informer is engineered to integrate with any(!) security model. We offer the ability to use a packaged native system or the ability to integrate in one click with an LDAP

Re: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV

2006-05-26 Thread Roger Glenfield
Also the same bad results when I tried either old Pick style methods NI.CNTR9998.CNTR 001 A A 002 0 9998 008 ANI+'0' 009 R R 010 8 8 Rog George Gallen wrote: HMM. No. Now it's not

[U2] Locking Error (Maybe SB+, maybe UV)

2006-05-26 Thread Charles Barouch
I'm getting this error and I don't know how to fix it. A full reboot hasn't helped: Program UPDATE.OI.GL.FROM.ORDER: Line 97, FATAL: The locks necessary for database operations at the current isolation level (0) are not held by this process. The program is a basic subroutine which is called by

[U2] XML Dom

2006-05-26 Thread Salvador Rigau
Hello, I have universe 10.1.18, I need read XML with a unknown format and load into universe file. Anyone has experience using XDOM in universe basic. Thaks for all Salvador Rigau --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Locking Error (Maybe SB+, maybe UV)

2006-05-26 Thread Mark Eastwood
If your Trigger Subroutine is going to Write, it must be first READU the item. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Barouch Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:47 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Locking Error (Maybe

Re: [U2] Locking Error (Maybe SB+, maybe UV)

2006-05-26 Thread john reid
Not too familiar with sb, but if it is re-opening the file, then any record locks are lost. A workaround MIGHT be to issue a RECORDLOCKU in the subroutine prior to the write. j On 5/26/06, Charles Barouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting this error and I don't know how to fix it. A full

RE: [U2] Locking Error (Maybe SB+, maybe UV)

2006-05-26 Thread Charles Barouch
Mark, That appears to work. I'm really not sure why, though. I appreciate the help. -- Charles Barouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ETL/Migration/Integration (718) 762-3884x1 Mark Eastwood wrote: | If your Trigger Subroutine is going to Write, it must be first READU

RE: [U2] U2 - MITS versus Informer

2006-05-26 Thread Brad Davis
The security I was talking about was at the application level - as I said you guys 'supposedly' have that in now, but not at the time we were looking at it - I'm talking about row by row security based on data selects. That's a finer level grain than login security. We liked your login security.

[U2] BCI

2006-05-26 Thread Cooper, Rudy
Hello List, I have a problem with the bci inserting into sql server. I'm running UV 10.1.10, W2K Sp2. I've already ran it thru IBM and they tell me it is a problem on the sql server side. Here is my problem: I have a uv program that inserts into a table in sql server via a stored

[U2] RE: BCI

2006-05-26 Thread Cooper, Rudy
Hello list, I solved my problem. It was my own fault. I'm almost to embarrassed to say, but maybe someone will learn from it. I added 2 new fields to my sproc and sqlbindparameter, I FORGOT to update my parameter markers ! I know, I know it was really dumb, geez. Rudy From:

[U2] UV - USING keyword

2006-05-26 Thread Jerry Banker
What is the proper way to use the USING keyword in a list? It doesn't seem to work as stated in the manual unless I am using (no pun intended) wrong. According to the manual this is how the command is used. LIST [DICT | USING [DICT] dictname] filename [records | FROM n] [selection]

RE: [U2] UV - USING keyword

2006-05-26 Thread Robin Stanley
I'm not really sure why this is our standard, but we always put it at the end of the statement: LIST CUSTOMER.FILE CUST.NAME USING DICT TEMP.DICT -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Banker Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:59 PM To:

[U2] Redback 4.3?

2006-05-26 Thread Mike Randall
I got an email today announcing U2 Web Development Environment 4.3. Beyond a new name, does anyone have any specifics on what's new in there? There seems to be mention of a new IDE and scheduler enhancements. Thanks, Mike --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To

RE: [U2] UV - USING keyword

2006-05-26 Thread Brenda Price
Tried that, did not work. UV 10.1.12 flavor Reality LIST BLP.TEMP CONT.MOS USING DICT CUST.MSTR.TEMP RetrieVe: syntax error. Unexpected symbol. Token was DICT. Scanned command was LIST BLP.TEMP CONT.MOS USING DICT -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [U2] UV - USING keyword

2006-05-26 Thread u2
Using the demo files that come with universe (MAKE.DEMO.FILES creates them) I can LIST USING DICT INVENTORY.F CUSTOMER.F And LIST USING DICT CUSTOMER.F INVENTORY.F And LIST CUSTOMER.F USING DICT INVENTORY.F Not that any of those commands make any sense ;-) but they all work. So maybe there's

RE: [U2] UV - USING keyword

2006-05-26 Thread Mark Eastwood
Make sure you don't have a Dict item named DICT in either file. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brenda Price Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:57 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UV - USING keyword Tried that, did

Re: [U2] UV; RetrieVe's xml to Excel

2006-05-26 Thread Adrian Merrall
Angelo, So what would it take to post the solution (with code) for those of us who do not want to re-invent the wheel? As I worked on it in company time I will have to check with the boss but all the required libs (poi, digester and log4j) are oss so sharing it would be in the community