Hi Keith,
I hadn't noticed that VLIST was any different. What I did notice is that the
object in question was last compiled on UV 8.3, You might want to recompile
this routine as well to update it. My guess is that VLIST is struggling with
the opcodes in the older code. Perhaps IBM changed some
Epicor's Avante is one good choice
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Marcos
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 5:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] List of ERP suppliers
Hi all,
Can anyone suggest a very good ERP soluti
Hi there,
We have just upgraded both Universe and System Builder, going from UV
10.1.8 to 10.2.0 and from SB+ 3.4 to 5.4.
Because the SB+ common block changed slightly, I had to recompile all
programs that referenced it. However, I have discovered that not all
the source code was on the producti
Hi all,
Can anyone suggest a very good ERP solution running on universe?
Regards,
Jeff Marcos
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Gabe
This is probably the result of packet optimisation on your WAN (I've seen
this on X.25 based WANs - it looks like your problem even if not an X.25
WAN).
You need to look at the packet forwarding parameters on the WAN nodes - they
are typically set to forward packets under the following condi
I don't suppose there is a way to termporarily allow a job I am running
after hours to go above the throttled 25% CPU usage, is there? =)
Oh man I do love UV's efficiency though. MVBASE 1.3 had no such facilities
and too many people running reports..pewf. Frozen mouse pointer.
Gabe
On 5/2
We just deployed a new nationwide WAN for our stores with DSL as the access
method (not public DSL, DSL to a MPLS backbone, private, never touches the
public internet)...
I have noticed that latency is a bit of a problem in some locations. Now I
am working with the provider to see what they can d
Gabe, optimize with "Background Services" at the server. And a tl_server.exe
process is assigned to every client connection to UniVerse. So you will have
a separate tl_server.exe process for each connection (look at Task Manager
on the server). The Windows PID # of the process will equal the User N
Should I optimize Windows for "Programs" or "Background Services"? I am not
sure which Windows considers the tl_server.exe processes...
Thanks,
Gabe
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
