What I do is convert all the CRT's and PRINTs to strings in a copy of the U2
subroutine and then pass them back as an argument to the Uniobject
subroutine, which calls the copy, not the original.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: waivic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008
Hello all!
I see that U2 gets the next hold entry number from an item in the DICT of
ANPHOLD called NEXT.HOLD. It seems to automatically roll over at - it
won't go to 5 digits. Although we use the BANNER UNIQUE option on the SETPTR
command so that the actual ID of the print job also
Hi Louie,
Did you perform a SET.INDEX after moving the data?
-- Original message --
From: Louie Bergsagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We use flashcopy to move data from one computer to another, and recently
noticed that UniVerse is no longer recognizing the indexes even
Identical file system path to the files and indexes?
Wally Terhune
SWG Client Support - Information
Management
You probably just need to use SET.INDEX to change the pathname to where
the index file is now located. It's been discussed lots of times in
this forum is the most common problem with indexes in UV. It's a
feature!! :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We've never done a SET.INDEX, but the indexes used to work just fine.
I wonder if they have to be set once and they work until the next upgrade?
-- Louie
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Hi Brian,
First, for the U2 readers on this list, let me explain that the ANPHOLD file
that Brian referred is not a file provided by UniVerse.
It is a replacement in SpoolerPlus (our generic Pick/Reality print spooler)
for the HOLD file that is in UniVerse.
It allows us to have a single
No, but how could it have worked before? If a SET.INDEX was required,
wouldn't it have to be executed after every copy?
We've never done that.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Wally Terhune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Identical file system path to the files and indexes?
---
u2-users mailing
If not an identical pathname now, it would simply mean you had an old
index at the same pathname previously. Now it appears you don't. Index
broken - 'cause index is not there. Very common problem in UV.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Louie,
Within each file 'header' is a pointer to the index file. It is stored as a
full path name (unless specified otherwise). If the account is moved and the
file paths change, then the link/pointer to the index file will break (no
longer point to the index file).
The SET.INDEX enables you to
Perhaps this is oversimplifying, but if you can capture the spooler file
number, why not rename it after it's been created to something with a larger
sequence?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Dave Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Brian,
First, for the U2 readers on this list, let me
Wasn't there some talk at one point of using relative pathnames? Is that
supported in the newer releases?
-- Original message --
From: Wally Terhune [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Identical file system path to the files and indexes?
Wally Terhune
SWG Client Support -
Looks like the Digest system isn't working properly - I'm getting
individual posts instead of the Digest.
David Norman
Senior Software Engineer
SA Ambulance Service
Box 3, GPO
Adelaide, South Australia 5001
*+61 8 8274 0384
* fax +61 8 8271 4844
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another excellent burner is ImgBurn (http://www.imgburn.com/) - it also is
free.
Gregor Scott
Development Department
Reynolds and Reynolds Pty Ltd
Ph: +61-3-9535-
Fax: +61-3-9562-8143
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny
Kevin,
That's a very interesting idea that I hadn't thought of!
I will come up with a mathematical conversion model and try it out here in
the office.
Thanks very much for thinking outside the box,
Dave
Dave Taylor
Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
Authorized IBM Business Partner
49 Aspen
15 matches
Mail list logo
