Nailing ports on Windows is a critical issue.? IANA port rules specify
well-known and registered ports?ports should NOT be used without registration.?
At a minimum, a good OS would leave them alone at least for requests for
"dynamic" or "random" port numbers.? However, Windows will grab ANYTHING
Curt,
RE: "nailed" ports.
After a lot of hair pulling, I solved this problem on Unix but I don't know if
it can be done on Windows and certainly not the same way.
On Unix, UV uses a file named unohist but IIRC, on Windows, it uses the PID as
the port #.
I have a couple of ideas so contact me
G'day Baker,
Just thinking in the sandbox, with no 4Tb databases to be found, BUT (as
usual) there may be many aspects to the answer
My initial thoughts would be that avoiding running a subroutine to
determine part file for EVERY write and non-sequential READ would
represent a saving "per transac
"Real" Indexing should win - compound key based on wo...@id, index on
word and then traverse keys in Basic (or via a select) ... saves having
to juggle your own key blocks for larger intersects/more popular words
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage > Better by Design!
>-Original Message-
Harold,
Is there any reason you don't use the UV command AUTOLOGOUT to time out idle
sessions?
It does what you want already from within UV already (and can be setup
individually or globally for all UV sessions) and doesn't have the problem of
just looking at terminal keyboard input idle time
The "who" command's interpretation of idle is solely based on terminal
activity: "Is there any input coming from the user?" type of activity.
Any unix process that does not have terminal i/o will register as idle in
the "who" output.
Gregor
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listse
Thanks to all who made suggestions. I'm definitely going to use some of
them to improve processing.
Good news: Universe is not at fault!
So why did the process just end? Because a background process we run
logs out processes idle for more than 3 hours. To determine idle time
we check the 7
> From: Baker Hughes
> Does anyone have any real life examples of performance
> gains from converting your large file to 64 bit files?
>
> Does anyone have a performance comparison of 64 bit
> files vs. distributed files.
>
> I wonder if a 4 terabyte file responds better/faster
> than a distr
November/December 2007.
www.intl-spectrum.com/mag/NOVDEC.2007/default.aspx
Regards,
Clif
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Brian Leach wrote:
Hi George
I wrote about this in one of the back issues of Spectrum (you can
download
these from www.intl-spectrum.com).
-Original Message-
Does anyone have any real life examples of performance gains from converting
your large file to 64 bit files?
Does anyone have a performance comparison of 64 bit files vs. distributed files.
I wonder if a 4 terabyte file responds better/faster than a distributed/part
file? SELECTs, WRITES, oth
Brian:
I really like these suggestions and will give it a go.
Thanks-
Harold
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:44 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2]
Harold
You might want to look at splitting out some of those index records, e.g.
where you have 10,000 fields in an index for CRIME, split this into CRIME,
CRIME-1, CRIME-2 etc. with a maximum number of entries per index. Otherwise
you are not going to get efficient storage at those sizes: if they
Sounds like a job for indexing.
Jerry Banker
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Oaks, Harold
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:54 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe just quits
Barry:
Thanks fo
I'm leaning towards the "string too large" theory. I'd definitely try this
same thing with sequential I/O.
-K
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
If this were windows, I would throw "memory leak" out there.
I've seen certain SELECT statements in Unidata "leak" - to the point the
U2 PID eventually dies a very bad death back to the shell.
On windows, we can see this using process explorer.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...
15 matches
Mail list logo
