The main benefit for EDA is to be able to tell clients that your application
runs on Oracle, DB2, SQL Server, etc. At the end of the day the customer may
just run U2, but it enables a VAR to meet a criteria. Tender documents might
require that products have to run on Oracle that would have den
Short, hard to misspell, unique, and not likely to be confused with
something gross or stupid.
In a message dated 2/20/2011 7:00:38 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
slestak...@gmail.com writes:
I am not in marketing by any means, but isnt the chore for branding
to make something that "sticks
All I can say is ... Ewww.
Packaging stinks everywhere, but that does look tremendously frustrating.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Brian Leach wrote:
> Almost all my frustrations are with Microsoft.
>
> Over half the development I did last year was simply handling differences
> between Win7x6
We have a silly marketing ploy in my town that tweaks me every time I
drive by. A local security company has their sign on the pole upside
down. Been that way for 3 years now. I have no idea why they have
not made them flip it over, but it certainly draws the eye. G.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 a
I am not in marketing by any means, but isnt the chore for branding
to make something that "sticks" whether it is a word or not? Sony is
not a real word, but a great company name.
The source for Ubuntu's name is pretty well known and documented on their site.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:57 AM, St
Or the Gnu version, Gawk King. Had to go there.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Kevin King wrote:
> Ah how I miss the caveman days when you could name your kids "awk", "grep",
> and "sed" and people wouldn't stare...
> ___
> U2-Users mailing list
>
IIRC, the company that asked for it was losing sales to competitors
for their app based purely on "name-brand" and needed to store data on
DB2 for a customer. DB abstraction is a good thing. Would be cool if
we had a real ORM, but as we have seen, instead of using industry
practices, we have yet
On 18/02/11 05:09, DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com) wrote:
>
>
> Even though Fedora is sort-of (but not) the 'community' version of Red Hat,
> there are major differences between the two; which are not clearly
> documented when it comes to commercial applications - installing and
> running.
>
> If you h