Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Wjhonson
500 Megabytes and counting, so I can see where a variable is used That's a non-starter for me. -Original Message- From: Doug Averch To: U2 Users List Sent: Fri, Feb 17, 2012 6:48 pm Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Whe

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Doug Averch
Whether we are talking about Telnet that uses port 23 or UniObjects that uses or 31438 or HTTP that uses 80, it not the port that is the problem. It is not the way packets are transported or what overhead each different protocol has. The fact remains for me it is the presentation. Why do you thi

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Tony Gravagno
> From: Bill Haskett > Just to let people know, mvNET offer telnet as one of > the connection methods (I use uodotnet) but it's fine > for external developers for our ..NET application. > Also, if I'm not mistaken, Fusionware uses telnet as > their underlying connection method. (mv.NET also s

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyonewould want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Holt, Jake
Undelete sometimes works, always been hit or miss for me. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of George Gallen Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:22 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread George Gallen
Without testing...One advantage that I can think of if you use windows to do the delete is it will get Moved to the trashcan, assuming it's local to the PC, and you can always get it back. If you use dos, I don't think it goes to the trashcan. One of the features I use dos for however is to glo

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Wjhonson
It's still easier from DOS :) -Original Message- From: Phil Walker To: U2 Users List Sent: Fri, Feb 17, 2012 12:11 pm Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Actually, if you are on a newer version of windows the explorer has a search

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Phil Walker
Actually, if you are on a newer version of windows the explorer has a search bar where you can filter on anything including extension. From there do your deletions in the current directory only > -Original Message- > From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- > boun

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Wjhonson
Green screen is still around because the dollar is still around. When we get to the society where you can work on what you want, and still get paid a living wage, then green screen will probably go away. Will "it works don't break it" Johnson -Original Message- From: Ed Clark T

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Bill Haskett
Ed: Just to let people know, mvNET offer telnet as one of the connection methods (I use uodotnet) but it's fine for external developers for our .NET application. Also, if I'm not mistaken, Fusionware uses telnet as their underlying connection method. Bill --

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Ed Clark
actually your example is pretty easy on current windows versions. Type *.txt into the windows explorer search box, then select and delete. On the upside, when you delete the files, you know for sure what directory you are in because it's in the title bar. On the down side, your search retrieved

Re: [U2] mvToolbox

2012-02-17 Thread George Gallen
Sockets were developed when a system was capable of handling more than One listening service! IP just wasn't good enough - now you needed a port# too. Proabably not historically correct...but most likely functionally correct. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org

Re: [U2] mvToolbox

2012-02-17 Thread Bill Haskett
Gee...I wonder when sockets were developed? They must be archaic too! :-) Bill - Original Message - *From:* dave...@gmail.com *To:* U2 Users List *Date:* 2/16/2012 7:16 PM *Subject:* Re: [U2] mvToolbox Tony, my

Re: [U2] mvToolbox

2012-02-17 Thread Wjhonson
"Why is DOS still on Windows? Because there are some things you just can't do easily with windows," Just the other day I did a del *.txt pretty trivial to do at the DOS prompt. Rather more cumbersome to do in a Window click click click point, select click click select point click. --

Re: [U2] mvToolbox

2012-02-17 Thread George Gallen
Why? Because it has almost no overhead, and has the most flexibility. Can the 3 year old (assuming they understood the process) select items from one file based on selection Then pull items from another file using a related ID and save that list. Perform that again on two other files and save