Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-19 Thread Symeon Breen
Same here -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ed Clark Sent: 19 February 2012 00:43 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-19 Thread Brian Leach
I have a simple program that builds them from a script. THat way the scripts form part of the system definition and get version managed like the rest .. As far as I'm concerned dictionaries should be treated like source code. Brian Sent from my iPad On 18 Feb 2012, at 21:53, Boydell, Stuart

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-19 Thread Doug Averch
[ad] Our product XLr8Editor supports version control for dictionaries as well as programs, procs, VOC items, etc. We have been doing this for some time now. I would be happy to give a webinar this week on it if there is some interest on version control. Regards, Doug www.u2logic.com XLr8Editor

[U2] telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-19 Thread Susan Joslyn
Greetings, I agree with Brian that dictionaries are definitely part of the software and should be managed (versioned/deployed, etc.) with the rest of the software. Certain items in the data section of hashed files, too. Procs. Everything. Anything that contributes to the infrastructure of the