Side comment:
I understand what Wil is saying and I think he has a valid point. But
I believe the value of the point is now insignificant. The tiny bit of
contention that Will brings up here is about just how much disk access
is done by any given process. Eliminate disk reads and the process
speed
To be more clear, although there may be some slight differences, if all the
pieces are all in memory for the duration of the select or selects, those
differences in timing will be so tiny, that it won't make any difference in
real life.
The most critical improvement in speed, is simply adding
I didn't miss it.
The point of the request, was from the beginning to the ending.
Of course the first *portion* will be quick and use few disk reads.
I was discussing the full example.
-Original Message-
From: Wols Lists
To: u2-users
Sent: Fri, Mar 8, 2013 2:43 pm
Subject: Re: [
On 08/03/13 22:07, Wjhonson wrote:
> If your file is small enough, and your system idle enough that the file
> remains *in memory* for all possible scenarios below, than you may not notice
> speed issues.
>
> However, the monster in the kitchen, is the number of DISK READS you are
> doing. If
Jeffery,
I would say #1 does the trick.
Any U2 TCL query evaluates from left to right. When one term eliminates the
record the query on that record stops, and the query continues to the next
record. So #1 is exactly your most effective, leaving the complex i-descriptor
to evaluate only the
If your file is small enough, and your system idle enough that the file remains
*in memory* for all possible scenarios below, than you may not notice speed
issues.
However, the monster in the kitchen, is the number of DISK READS you are doing.
If your prior reads get cycled out before they are
You can already return record ids with a SELECT that have some multi-value
which matches, just by using the WITH command.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Butera
To: u2-users
Sent: Fri, Mar 8, 2013 12:49 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata WHEN/ASSOCIATED
On 03/08/2013 03:47 PM, Da
On 08/03/13 21:03, Jeffrey Butera wrote:
> While I'm on a roll... I often look at how to make queries run faster.
> In short, we index all the commonly used data fields we can and (of
> course) it makes world of difference. However, I have some questions
> about optimal ways to query data using
While I'm on a roll... I often look at how to make queries run faster.
In short, we index all the commonly used data fields we can and (of
course) it makes world of difference. However, I have some questions
about optimal ways to query data using a mix of indexed data,
non-indexed data and i
On 03/08/2013 03:47 PM, David A. Green wrote:
Jeff,
This could be a good enhancement. How do you want it to work?
1. SELECT just the IDs or whatever the SAVING clause points to.
Or
2. SELECT the IDs,MV pointers that match
But until it goes through I'm sure someone has already written the code
Jeff,
This could be a good enhancement. How do you want it to work?
1. SELECT just the IDs or whatever the SAVING clause points to.
Or
2. SELECT the IDs,MV pointers that match
But until it goes through I'm sure someone has already written the code to
do it in a UniBasic program.
David A. Green
Stupid question: is there a good reason why WHEN/ASSOCIATED can only be
used with LIST and not SELECT?
--
Jeffrey Butera, PhD
Associate Director for Applications and Web Services
Information Technology
Hampshire College
413-559-5556
http://www.hampshire.edu
http://www.facebook.com/hampshirecoll
I don't remember off the top of my head but its contained in the slides for
the webinar. They are freely downloadable in PDF form.
*Aaron Titus*
Senior Software Engineer
F.W. Davison & Company, Inc.
508-747-7261 x245
ati...@fwdco.com
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Symeon Breen wrote:
> URL
==
International Spectrum Conference and Exhibition
Phoenix 2013 - April 15th-18th
==
Today is the last day to get the (March 8th) discount. Don't miss out on
saving y
Found it at http://updates.rocketsoftware.com/u2/
-Original Message-
From: Symeon Breen [mailto:syme...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 March 2013 17:13
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: RE: [U2] bdt in juno
URL please of the update site ??
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver
http://updates.rocketsoftware.com/u2/
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Symeon Breen wrote:
> URL please of the update site ??
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
URL please of the update site ??
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Titus
Sent: 08 March 2013 16:47
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] bdt in juno
I did this yesterday using the eclipse software u
I did this yesterday using the eclipse software update installation site
that rocket has. There is a webinar on rocket's web site that explains
exactly how to to it.
*Aaron Titus*
Senior Software Engineer
F.W. Davison & Company, Inc.
508-747-7261 x245
ati...@fwdco.com
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:
That's good to hear Doug - what url did you use for the plugin, or did you
do it manually ? If manually did you coppy everything in the plugins
directory or just certain pieces ?
Thnaks
Symeon.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@lists
19 matches
Mail list logo
