in the 17 years I have been
working with UniData.
Cheers,
Kebbon
> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:17:08 -0700
> From: stevenson.c...@gmail.com
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] FW: Running total from UniData dict
>
> As long as we're on the sub
As long as we're on the subject, how about a running average?
[running average] = [running total] / [number of items so far]
@NI is the item counter as the LIST command proceeds.
Using any of the methods discussed so far to get the running total,
divide by @NI:
DICT ORDER.DETAIL RUNAVG
Hi Chuck,
I take it QM does not support this use of the @n buffers, then?
If I may change the subject slightly, how about nested compound
I-descriptors?
We have the @n variables but they are local to the specific I-type
expression and hence don't persist from one evaluation to the next. We
This & it's ilk have always been an "Undocumented Feature" in both PI & UV.
001: I
002: @1...@record<8>
If it ever stops working, The pitchforks are coming out.
Recent versions of the documentation have added a bit of a disclaimer,
rather than embracing the feature:
Note: If you use @ in the
5
16 47 1
17 49 2
18 52 3
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
> Kebbon Irwin
> Sent: 23 July 2009 16:22
> To: u2-users@lists
2009 8:22 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] FW: Running total from UniData dict
I read this with great interest as I have an identical requirement.
However, I use Unidata and this technique does not seem to work, in either
ECLTYPE. Does anybody have a UDT solution?
Cheers,
Kebbon
Yes, Kebbon. Years ago, I hit this difference when contemplating a PI
to UD migration.
My fix isn't not very pretty to read, but it made conversion easier.
If I didn't have the construct to convert, I don't know that I would
use it, except that it's a nice bit of functionality.
Off the top
g.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Martin
Phillips
Sent: 23 July 2009 16:45
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] FW: Running total from UniData dict
Hi Kebbon,
> I read this with great interest as I have an identical requirement.
> However,
> I use Unidata and this
Hi Kebbon,
I read this with great interest as I have an identical requirement.
However,
I use Unidata and this technique does not seem to work, in either ECLTYPE.
Does anybody have a UDT solution?
0001: I
0002: @1...@record<8>
0003: MD2
0004: RUNNING TOT
0005: 10R
I was quite surprised that
I read this with great interest as I have an identical requirement. However, I
use Unidata and this technique does not seem to work, in either ECLTYPE. Does
anybody have a UDT solution?
Cheers,
Kebbon
> From: bernard.lu...@pentanasolutions.com
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Date: Tue
10 matches
Mail list logo
