subject:"\[U2\] Raid 0\+1 versus Raid 10 1\+0"

RE: [U2] Raid 0+1 versus Raid 10 1+0

2007-10-25 Thread Symeon Breen

tober 2007 21:36 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Raid 0+1 versus Raid 10 1+0 Hi All, I have just read a slide from the U2 University sessions whereby it states... RAID 0+1 is absolutely the fastest implementation possible for disk drives t>Internal and External Disk Drives -

Re: [U2] Raid 0+1 versus Raid 10 1+0

2007-10-24 Thread Doug Dumitru

phil walker wrote: Hi All, I have just read a slide from the U2 University sessions whereby it states... RAID 0+1 is absolutely the fastest implementation possible for disk drives t>Internal and External Disk Drives -Raid 0+1, striping and mirroring tWhen a mirrored disk drive is not commit

[U2] Raid 0+1 versus Raid 10 1+0

2007-10-24 Thread phil walker

Hi All, I have just read a slide from the U2 University sessions whereby it states... RAID 0+1 is absolutely the fastest implementation possible for disk drives t>Internal and External Disk Drives -Raid 0+1, striping and mirroring tWhen a mirrored disk drive is not committed to a WRITE, it is