I sent this to SB+ solutions but I also thought someone here might have
some opinions.
Sorry if this has been discussed before. I'm having problems getting to
indexinfocus.com to do a search.
Is anyone using UO.NET in an environment that includes SB+. We are and
to get into SB+ we have a wr
product, they seem to have
pooling covered, so the theory would be the same.
I hope that gives you some ideas at least.
Stuart.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of "Glenn
Batson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
26 January 2006 23:12
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UO.NET and SB+
I sent this to SB+ solutions but I also thought someone here might have
some opinions.
Sorry if this has been discussed before. I'm having problems getting to
indexinfocus.com to do a search.
Is anyone usi
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Sat Jan 28 05:54:41 2006
Subject: RE: [U2] UO.NET and SB+
Glenn
If you were considering a WWW route then RedBack supports "SBObjects"
directly and gives you a connection pool while at the same time being SB+
aware.
asily.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Batson
Sent: 29 January 2006 00:16
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UO.NET and SB+
My understanding is the sbobject is the state based implementation and wa
