Suppose I should have mentioned that my example was in c# using UniObjects
.Net. I have been able to see that using the readlist method allows the
program to run much faster, simply putting the select list into a loop and
reading one record at a time runs noticeably slower. I didn't have this
pro
4 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
Sorry so late, it's been very busy here and I've turned off u2 list
access at work in order to cope... Here's a snippet of code form the
very project that is currently taking up all my time. The array log
half Of Victor St Clair
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I've had the same experience, using a select loop in a list runs very
slowly, and was planning to try this same approach. I tried to use ReadList
method
e as the record count increases.
I'd appreciate any example you might be able share.
Thanks
Victor St. Clair
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donald Kibbey
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 4:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tabor
Sent: 05 November 2004 19:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY
*** Now you've got me wondering... ***
We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET d
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY
*** Now you've got me wondering... ***
We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET due to a considerable amount
of our non-MV programming is in VB.NET anyway. I'm getting the feeling
that UO.N
] UniObjects.NET speed/performance - PERFORMANCE SURVEY
*** Now you've got me wondering... ***
We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET due to a considerable amount
of our non-MV programming is in VB.NET anyway. I'm getting the feeling
that UO.NET is generally slow, but then r
On my test system the connection is slow but after that I feel it is
just fine.
grs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tabor
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET speed/performance
*** Now you've got me wondering... ***
We're considering moving from UO to UO.NET due to a considerable amount of our non-MV
programming is in VB.NET anyway. I'm getting the feeling that UO.NET is generally
slow, but then remembered, this conversation is one-sided so far.
On the flip side of t
TECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 4:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I find .net to be slow and cludgy in virtually all situations - even with
a
fast processor and 512MB RAM. I've been completely
Cheers
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2004 11:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> lol
>
> you don't actually conside
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> lol
>
> you don't actually consider 512Mb a lot of ram now do you ?
Actually, I certainly do ...
My mobo at home is maxed out for ram. It has 768Mb. I've just upgraded my daughter's
ram. Her pc has two slots and I've maxed out one ... with 512Mb.
And a lot of office
TED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 04:24 am
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
> I find .net to be slow and cludgy in virtually all situations - even with
a
> fast processor and 512MB RAM. I've been completely unimpressed with it
since
> i
2004 01:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I've found that altering the hostname parameter in
UniObjects.OpenSession from an IP address to a name (eg : sun_prodserver
) can *sometimes* dramatically increase session connect speeds.
This seems complete
ECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I've found that altering the hostname parameter in
UniObjects.OpenSession from an IP address to a name (eg : sun_prodserver
) can *sometimes* dramatically increase session connect speeds.
This seems completely counter-intuitive to me but it
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
Sent: 05 November 2004 00:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
Yes! We found it so slow we immediately reverted to the VB3 version, while
seeing if we can find a way around it. We have put very little
ed to my network configuration.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
Sent: Friday, 5 November 2004 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
Yes! We found it so slow we immediately reverted t
ED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:27 PM
Subject: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
> Is anyone else experiencing speed problems with Uniobjects.net?
>
> I've just upgraded our core application from Uniobjects to UONET
> (a non-trivial exercise as I'm sure you'
Chris,
I noticed that the initial session connection took a long time. It is so
noticeable.
grs
Is anyone else experiencing speed problems with Uniobjects.net?
I've just upgraded our core application from Uniobjects to UONET
(a non-trivial exercise as I'm sure you're aware) but the response
time
I found that using a select list within a loop was cause for a long nap... I fixed
that by reading the entire list into an array and then looping through the array.
I've read on this list that there is an updated uniobjects.dll available, but my VAR
was not able to locate it?!?
I really don't
Is anyone else experiencing speed problems with Uniobjects.net?
I've just upgraded our core application from Uniobjects to UONET
(a non-trivial exercise as I'm sure you're aware) but the response
times are atrocious. Opening a file has gone from being a virtually
instant response to taking well ov
21 matches
Mail list logo
