Re: [U2] Quick question on Longnames

2004-11-16 Thread Peter D. Ivanick
Many thanks for all the responses, very much appreciated, and happy to have tangentially roused the rabble. -- Peter Ivanick Sr. Programmer/Analyst School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 215.573.2306 Fax: 215.573.8777 http://www.vet.u

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] Quick question on Longnames

2004-11-11 Thread Stevenson, Charles
iginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MICHAEL MR Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unclassified RE: [U2] Quick question on Longnames So why isn't it the default on installation? Yes, I know it isn&

Re: [U2] Quick question on Longnames

2004-11-11 Thread Clifton Oliver
You know, some days the brain just doesn't work very well. Since I probably caused confusion to some of the newer folks with my previous blathering, let me point out that I answered the question of longnames by talking about the Type1 vs Type19 issue. Smooth, real smooth. Longnames handles the

Unclassified RE: [U2] Quick question on Longnames

2004-11-11 Thread HENDERSON MICHAEL MR
D] On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Sent: Friday, 12 November 2004 09:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] Quick question on Longnames LONGNAMES ON is always to be recommended these days. There are so few UNIX variants now that require a file name to be limited to 14 characters. There are no negati

RE: [U2] Quick question on Longnames

2004-11-11 Thread Piers Angliss
f Of Glenn Herbert Sent: 11 November 2004 19:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] Quick question on Longnames Just as a note, when universe went to IBM, and Ascential kept its own (now evolved) version, the first thing we did was change all the product files from Type1 to Type19 files; you wo

Re: [U2] Quick question on Longnames

2004-11-11 Thread Ray Wurlod
LONGNAMES ON is always to be recommended these days. There are so few UNIX variants now that require a file name to be limited to 14 characters. There are no negative implications (unless you'll miss the "file created with a truncated operating system name" messages!). LONGNAMES ON means that f

Re: [U2] Quick question on Longnames

2004-11-11 Thread Glenn Herbert
Just as a note, when universe went to IBM, and Ascential kept its own (now evolved) version, the first thing we did was change all the product files from Type1 to Type19 files; you won't find a Type1 installed on a DS Server unless it was manually created or existed prior to rev6 of the product.

Re: [U2] Quick question on Longnames

2004-11-11 Thread Clifton Oliver
First, I think you would be hard pressed to find a modern system that does not support longnames. It is my understanding that the 14 character limit in Unix when out somewhere around System III (Any Unix historians in the house?). If anyone is aware of a current platform that still has this res