RE: [U2] RE: [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-01 Thread Womack, Adrian
riginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hiscock Sent: Friday, 2 December 2005 1:39 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword? How about just adding a phrase to each DICT called &

RE: [U2] RE: [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-01 Thread Larry Hiscock
How about just adding a phrase to each DICT called "ALL" that lists all of the D-type items? eg: DICT CUST.MST ALL 001: PH 002: CUST.NAME CUST.ADDR1 CUST.ADDR2 CUST.CITY ... etc You could even write a simple program to SELECT DICT filename WITH TYPE = 'D' BY LOC, and then loop through & create t

Re: [U2] RE: [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Johnson
Not for nothing but I've worked on both platforms and I prefer Ud to Uv. My 1 cent - Original Message - From: "Ken Wallis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:07 PM Subject: [U2] RE: [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword? > To all you UniVers

Re: [U2] RE: [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-01 Thread Ian Stuart
Create an @ phrase in the DICT of the file with all the field name. This will also honour any associations. You could also create an @ALL phrase if you already have an @ phrase in the DICT LIST filename @ALL ED DICT CM @ 0001= PH 0002 = COMPANY ADD1 ADD2 ADD3 PCODE PROV ORDER.DATES ORDER.VAL