and can be used.
I will post a single program with all 10 tests for your convenience this
evening.
Thanks.
Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: "Rex Gozar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:14 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.
> M
significantly different.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Johnson
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 7:15 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.
>
>
> Has anyone
Thanks for the thanks.
Mark Johnson
I'm curious of the DIM A(5) method on other platforms. I dare not try it
on my Microdata clients.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Dodds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] REMOV
I believe MCD. I'll test the next time I visit this client.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.
> Which platforms don't support system(11)?
>
> > -Or
DIM A(5).
My 1 cent.
- Original Message -
From: "Piers Angliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 8:51 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.
> Not that it seems to matter these days but both this method and the <..-1>
> notat
ROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.
> My results were different. Substring assignment is very fast, but not as
> fast as <-1> and CONVERT.
>
>
> ***
> * substring assignment
> ***
> STIME = T
ugust 21, 2005 9:27 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.
Hi Mark,
There is another fast method to consider
A=""
FOR I=1 TO 5
IF A = "" THEN
A := I
END ELSE
A := @VM : I
END
NEXT I
It will take less then 1 secon
Hey, the evaluation of various methods is great, it would be even
greater if the folks doing the evaluating would let us know what sort
of hardware. One poster mentioned a laptop, that's good info. The
original guy mentions a production system that is in use, that's good
too. But, it would be mu
As Mark Baldridge pointed out, these kinds of tests are VERY platform
specific.
Could we set a convention that such things always include:
H/W platform
H/W configuration (memory, disk vs disk array, type, etc.)
Database platform (D3, UV, UD, etc.)
Host O/S release level
Database release level
Thanks Mark. Great job. You can satisfy some of the people some of the
time but you can never satisfy all of the people all of the time.
This obviously took some time to do and I appreciate the effort.
Tom Dodds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
630-235-2975
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My results were different. Substring assignment is very fast, but not as
fast as <-1> and CONVERT.
***
* substring assignment
***
STIME = TIME()
ITEM = SPACE(99)
PTR = 0
FOR J = 1 TO 5
L = LEN(J)+1
ITEM[1+PTR,L] = J:@VM
PTR += L
NE
Which platforms don't support system(11)?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dzevad Dizdar
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:27 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as pr
Of Dzevad Dizdar
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 05:27
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.
Hi Mark,
There is another fast method to consider
A=""
FOR I=1 TO 5
IF A = "" THEN
A := I
END ELSE
A := @VM : I
END
NEXT I
It wil
ce to post their average times. It ain't a virtual
memory issue like years (decades) ago.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Dzevad Dizdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.
> Hi Mark,
>
Hi Mark,
There is another fast method to consider
A=""
FOR I=1 TO 5
IF A = "" THEN
A := I
END ELSE
A := @VM : I
END
NEXT I
It will take less then 1 second to finish on our system.
Dzevad
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo
