REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: "Brad Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Bounce notice: Eugene, Your recent post to our lists bounced because either
you are not a member or because you are not signed up using the e-mail address
which you used to post. To subscribe or resubscribe please visit
http://
On 5/17/07, Andy Pflueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We're also running UD off our SAN without any significant performance
> impact. Our's operates just as if UD was running off a physical disk
> in the server.
>
Same here. We use an EMC san and don't do anything specific to Unidata. It
is j
We're also running UD off our SAN without any significant performance
impact. Our's operates just as if UD was running off a physical disk
in the server. Our setup involves using Veritas Cluster Server for
deporting/importing the SAN disk volumes for UD (and Oracle too since
we have both running o
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: 16 May 2007 18:55
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Running UniData on SAN
We have one customer very happy with their LeftHand Networks SAN, and
another about to install one.
We have one customer very happy with their LeftHand Networks SAN, and
another about to install one.
I think IBM is squeamish with the competition for bandwidth - at the IOD
last year, they in particular said that Exchange places such a heavy demand
on the disk subsystem, that it should not be plac
