RE: [UD] Known ODBC Linux or 6.0 issues?

2004-04-22 Thread Ken Wallis
Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote: I think someone posted the name of the voc entry required if you want to do something at the time of an ODBC login, such as initializing named common memory. Otherwise, I suspect it is in the doc somewhere (sorry I don't have more details). Check the voc on your

RE: [UD] Known ODBC Linux or 6.0 issues?

2004-04-21 Thread Anthony Youngman
You'll need to search the archives for this (I don't have any of the stuff you mention :-) but there was discussion about calling virtual fields from ODBC a little while ago. I think at least one of the points was does it rely on environment variables or stuff set up by LOGIN? It appears that

RE: [UD] Known ODBC Linux or 6.0 issues?

2004-04-21 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
I think someone posted the name of the voc entry required if you want to do something at the time of an ODBC login, such as initializing named common memory. Otherwise, I suspect it is in the doc somewhere (sorry I don't have more details). Check the voc on your previous system for an entry like

Re: [UD] Known ODBC Linux or 6.0 issues?

2004-04-21 Thread Results
Ken, At the risk of stating the obvious, have you checked that the correct version of the SUBR is cataloged? Sorry to have to throw this out without fully researching it first, but I've got a client with a pressing problem. They are in the final stages of preparing to switch over from their

RE: [UD] Known ODBC Linux or 6.0 issues?

2004-04-21 Thread Ken Wallis
Wol wrote: I think at least one of the points was does it rely on environment variables or stuff set up by LOGIN? It appears that ODBC has a different login setup to a normal user - maybe even that UD needs a correct $PATH to find the executable for SUBR? I dunno. Or do the SUBRoutines rely