[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug Miller) wrote on 03/24/2004 11:45:32 AM:
> With the MC Service guard they can TOC a system (Transfer of control) at
a
> drop of a hat and be back up and running on the 2nd machine very
> quickly. The 2nd machine grabs the ip address of the primary and people
> just ha
At 01:40 AM 3/24/2004, you wrote:
A client of mine is has a policy that all application data should, where
possible, be stored on their EMC SAN instead of on local disks. They don't,
however have a machine I can use for testing at this point that can access
their SAN storage.
We have another custo
List'
Subject: RE: [UD] RFS and SAN storage
Thanks Rodney,
Can you confirm that you do use RFS? If you have 30GB files then they must
be dynamic, so they must be OK on SAN too.
Cheers,
Ken
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of
Thanks Rodney,
Can you confirm that you do use RFS? If you have 30GB files then they must
be dynamic, so they must be OK on SAN too.
Cheers,
Ken
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Baakkonen, Rodney
>We have been using a Hitachi SAN with
We have been using a Hitachi SAN with Veritas for several years on a Solaris
machine. We moved there from a DG environment using mirrored disks. I can't
think of anything to note about the change. We have a couple of files
aproaching 30 gig in size. The SAN has performed well. We are on Unidata 5.2
