Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

Exalt G2 11Ghz On Nov 2, 2014 10:42 PM, "RickG" wrote: > And on that note: What are people using for their licensed needs these > days? > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Adair Winter > wrote: > >> Licensed gear. :) That's what a guy does. >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Phil Curnutt

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

Saf Lumina 11GHz Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 11/02/2014 07:42 PM, RickG wrote: And on that note: What are people using for their licensed needs these days? On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Adair Winter mailto:ada...@am

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

Saf lumina but wouldn't recomend since they aren't supporting higher throughput (80mhz and higher qam ) On Nov 3, 2014 12:41 AM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote: > Saf Lumina 11GHz > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com > On 11/02/2014 07:42 PM, RickG wrote: > > And

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

The SAF Integra does, however. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "TJ Trout" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 2:55:16 AM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

[Ubnt_users] UVC

How are you guys liking the UniFi Vision Cameras cameras compared to the AirCams? Is it like ToughCable where oh heavens no, pull down any of the original you have, but the new stuff... good quality at a reasonable price? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics

Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC

Yes... the new cameras are worlds better than the old cameras... but I never really had any complaints about the old cameras except for the plastic mounts (which are now metal). The software, on the other hand, is much much better. On 11/3/14, 8:30 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > How are you guys likin

Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC

I have never been able to get a quality image out of the original cameras. They were always less than the quality of my cell phone (as I once demonstrated by putting my cell phone immediately adjacent to one of the cameras and taking a comparison picture. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Co

Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC

Ok... so keep in mind that's cell phone PICTURE vs moving image. https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10462907_260238517514852_5960389472087622690_n.jpg?oh=0a2fef678744b3324e6a79ebaca632b8&oe=54E0E7BA https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10173554_245483628990341_

Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC

Sorry, I meant video. My cell phone records 720p all the same. http://bit.ly/1t6Xq6a - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Matt Hoppes" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 7:50:50 AM Subje

Re: [Ubnt_users] {Spam?} Re: NanoBeam M5 400

Are you saying the EPMP is a terrible CPE? Is it the size that sucks? *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett *Sent:* Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:24 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] {Spam?} Re: NanoBeam M5 400

Re: [Ubnt_users] {Spam?} Re: NanoBeam M5 400

The Force 100 is an absolute bear to assemble. It's worse than the NanoBridge. I put a scathing review of it on the WSIPA Members and AFMUG lists about 6 weeks ago. They have a new one coming out, though, that's a lot better. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.i

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

Yep but with 2ft they're useless to me On Nov 3, 2014 4:40 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > The SAF Integra does, however. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > -- > *From: *"TJ Trout" > *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" > *

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

Meaning that you're limited to 2' or they're limited to 2'? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "TJ Trout" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 10:12:40 AM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed

Re: [Ubnt_users] {Spam?} Re: NanoBeam M5 400

except that whole wire grid thing that holds the feed our in front of the dish. if that ever gets moved/bent before it gets installed... your focal will be off. I'm still not huge on it. On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > The Force 100 is an absolute bear to assemble. It's wo

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

On 11/3/14, 8:12 AM, TJ Trout wrote: > Yep but with 2ft they're useless to me There are now other models of Integra that you attach to an antenna just like Lumina. ~Seth ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/l

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

+1 … also Exalt G2 18GHz & 23GHz From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Adair Winter Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 3:22 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400 Exalt G2 11Ghz On Nov 2, 2014

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400

We have the SAF Integra-S on 4' external antennas. We chose it over the Exalt G2 because of the fiber port. On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Adam Greene wrote: > +1 ... also Exalt G2 18GHz & 23GHz > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] > *On Behalf Of

Re: [Ubnt_users] Urgent edgswitch availability - Ebola response

Hi Faisal, Many thanks for your well thought out response. Totally agreed on all of the factors / design points you highlight. I've done a lot of very similar designs to what you describe: 24V, DIN rail boxes, Mikrotik750UP, etc. High temp, high dust resistance definitely a given...which makes

Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC

I love them in comparison. Having sound and nightvision its worlds of difference. The NVR needs a little tweaking though. Andy Trimmell System Engineer Precision Data Solutions, LLC Mooresville, IN 46158 317-831-3000 ext 211 www.pdsconnect.me From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.or

Re: [Ubnt_users] PSA: Ubnt XM v5.5.10 major bug -- recommend using v5.5.8 -- STA scan-list empty, cannot connect to AP

This is correct. I titled the thread wrong, instead of "Major Bug in v5.5.10" should have been "Major Bug in all v5.5." Any Ubnt STA that sees more than 200 networks is unable to connect to anything. If we limit our scan list to only 28% of 5GHz frequencies (5160-5280) and we still run into the *b

Re: [Ubnt_users] PSA: Ubnt XM v5.5.10 major bug -- recommend using v5.5.8 -- STA scan-list empty, cannot connect to AP

Not to say this isn't an issue, but are you even able to use those frequencies if there are that many APs around? > On Nov 3, 2014, at 5:46 PM, Colin Zwiebel wrote: > > This is correct. I titled the thread wrong, instead of "Major Bug in v5.5.10" > should have been "Major Bug in all v5.5." Any

Re: [Ubnt_users] PSA: Ubnt XM v5.5.10 major bug -- recommend using v5.5.8 -- STA scan-list empty, cannot connect to AP

We actually can use UNII-1. How we get so damn many BSSIDs in UNII-1 I'm not sure. Very faint office Wifi, I suspect. Take a look at an airview from Charlestown, MA to a rooftop in downtown Boston. You can see even UNII-2 is quite noisy. But UNII-1 is not bad. Interference is very different link-b

Re: [Ubnt_users] PSA: Ubnt XM v5.5.10 major bug -- recommend using v5.5.8 -- STA scan-list empty, cannot connect to AP

By my book that's kinda the definition of a bug, but I'm glad you got it figured out and all fixed up! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Matt Hardy wrote: > To follow up on this thread, we found the i

Re: [Ubnt_users] PSA: Ubnt XM v5.5.10 major bug -- recommend using v5.5.8 -- STA scan-list empty, cannot connect to AP

There may be a lot of SSIDs show up or there may be some hot signals, but if they have little traffic, they won't make a large impact. The waterfall view is the most important. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "

Re: [Ubnt_users] PSA: Ubnt XM v5.5.10 major bug -- recommend using v5.5.8 -- STA scan-list empty, cannot connect to AP

It wasn't an RF thing really, it was too little memory allocated to the call for the list of SSIDs after a scan. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > There may be a lot of SSIDs show

Re: [Ubnt_users] PSA: Ubnt XM v5.5.10 major bug -- recommend using v5.5.8 -- STA scan-list empty, cannot connect to AP

My fault for not responding to the correct message. Usually only GMailers do that. ;-) I was meaning to reply to Colin. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Monda