Re: [Ubnt_users] 24 mile AF5

Here's a 22 mile hop. Really we put it up just to see how they would do at distance. Modulation is dipping on one end because of interference from a Rocket that I can't re-frequency, but is going to licensed soon. Nate On 1/3/2015 6:43 PM, Clay Stewart wrote: Currently with rain and hea

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24 mile AF5

what a great location! Doesn't look like there are going to be a lot of other transmitters around there... On 1/3/15 4:43 PM, Clay Stewart wrote: Currently with rain and heavy fog Heavy rain earlier in week, and more tomorrow... On Thursday, January 1, 2015, Mike Hammett

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

To be more precise, 5150 - 5350 are unavailable on the AF5 due to hardware. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Mathew Howard" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2015 7:27:00 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

Correct. I haven't heard if anything is in the works or not. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Chris Soiles [csoi...@riocities.net] Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 7:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_us

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

So 5.2 won't work? New hardware release needed? Sent from my iPad Chris Soiles Owner Rio Cities csoi...@riocities.net 505-966-6389 On Jan 3, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: AF5 has been DFS approved since it first shipped. however, it will only go down to 5.4ghz due to hardware (filter

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

AF5 has been DFS approved since it first shipped. however, it will only go down to 5.4ghz due to hardware (filter/antenna) limitations, so 5.2ghz won't be happening on the current hardware. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on beha

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocketm900

Blair, That makes sense. Let us know if you find any and I'll do the same! On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Blair Davis wrote: > IME, bandpass filters are useful in 900MHz, if you are close to a pager > tower. Around here, those are on 930MHz or so and very hot. > > But if you want to co-locat

[Ubnt_users] AF5

If and When they get DFS approved, will the new channels just work? Haven't bought any yet, but this could sway me to buy now vs wait Chris Soiles Owner Rio Cities csoi...@riocities.net 505-966-6389 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http:

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24 mile AF5

Currently with rain and heavy fog Heavy rain earlier in week, and more tomorrow... On Thursday, January 1, 2015, Mike Hammett wrote: > Something I would very much recommend against. I run 3' dishes for links > about that long. That's 22 dB less link margin than what I'd run. That's a > big d

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocketm900

IME, bandpass filters are useful in 900MHz, if you are close to a pager tower. Around here, those are on 930MHz or so and very hot. But if you want to co-locate a couple 900MHz UBNT AP's, I think channel filters are the way to go... If I can find any. -- On 1/3/2015 1:43 PM, RickG wrote:

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocketm900

I meant for 900MHz. On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Blair Davis wrote: > IME, bandpass filters are useless on 2.4GHz unless you have a major > source of out of band interference... > > And, being locked into a channel isn't too bad, in the country. Don't > know how well it would work in the ci

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocketm900

IME, bandpass filters are useless on 2.4GHz unless you have a major source of out of band interference... And, being locked into a channel isn't too bad, in the country. Don't know how well it would work in the city... -- On 1/2/2015 9:02 PM, RickG wrote: Yes, getting locked into a channel is