Re: [Ubnt_users] how did they measure this?

I'd say 120-140 mbps of traffic with perfect conditions. Certainly doable, we've all done it. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Jan Van Kort wrote: > 40Mhz, 6mi, 90%,

Re: [Ubnt_users] how did they measure this?

If you do an iPerf test between devices on either end (no other traffic) you should get close to 150mbps on that link. The part of the datasheet saying 54mbps that you attached is cutoff before the chart gets to the meat of it. In fact, that screenshot only shows the 802.11a modulation scheme

Re: [Ubnt_users] how did they measure this?

40Mhz, 6mi, 90%, mcs15. On 11/01/2017 03:53 PM, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: > What channel width are you using? How long is the link? How is the signal > quality? What MCS level are they linking up at? > -Mike > >> On Nov 1, 2017, at 15:49, Jan Van Kort wrote: >> >>

[Ubnt_users] how did they measure this?

I deployed these pbe-m5-400's based on the datasheet that said 150+ Mbps TCPIP throughput! Real throughput is 54Mbps! What is wrong with this picture? If I replace the pbe-m5-400 with pbe-5ac-gen2 that claims 450Mbps and claims to triple the throughput of the pbe-m5-400 what can I really