I believe the perpetrator of that job had OCD. Glad my techs who are slobs
didn’t perform that mod.
Paul Tackett, COO
406-284-3174x105
<mailto:p...@latmt.com> p...@latmt.com
---
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wis
Impressive. We found that if there was LOS at that distance, we had to cut the
yagi down to a nub as the signal was too hot and performance was terrible!
Paul Tackett, COO
(406)284-3174x105
p...@latmt.com
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
off the hook…
Paul Tackett, COO
(406)284-3174x105
p...@latmt.com
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tommy Adams
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 14:09
To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group'
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNET 900Mhz
Now ours
We have deployed these at 2 locations and while they work, they do seem to need
an occasional reboot. I would make sure that the devices are easily accessible
by someone onsite who can cycle the power should traffic stop flowing.
Paul Tackett, COO
(406)284-3174x105
p...@latmt.com
Amen. Probably dual band router set to Auto channel and Auto power, bouncing
around like a jumping bean, creating your fun-filled game of whack-a-mole.
Paul Tackett, COO
(406)284-3174x105
p...@latmt.com
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf
Are they using 5Ghz WiFi? Perhaps internal contention for spectrum?
Paul Tackett, COO
(406)284-3174x105
p...@latmt.com
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jan Van Kort
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 10:58
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Yes
On 7/14/2016 8:17 AM, Shawn Burgei wrote:
Has anyone else had issues with AC2 V22 leaving blank gaps in the
bandwidth charts?
Thanks,
Shawn
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
Will they RMA the older version?
On 12/9/2014 2:01 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Check the date code (the five characters printed on the label before
the MAC), I think 1431G or newer will work... I verified it does work
on 1431G, anyway.
If I understand correctly, the older Rockets will not
no working
We have noticed that if the SW versions don't match it will not work.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Peoples dpe...@gmail.com wrote:
This is something that has been an issue since 5.5 as far as I know.
On Nov 16, 2014 11:18 AM, Paul Conlin pcon...@blazebroadband.com
So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought will
not certify because of hardware problems?
Are they going to trade out what we bought expecting certification for
hardware that will certify?
What a pile of !!
I guess we need to stop buying until the promised
not getting certified
totally sucked. I've got a bunch of them.
Rory
-Original Message-
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 5:45 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400
So
.
Rory
-Original Message-
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:21 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
.
Different situation.
Rory
-Original Message-
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:21 PM
*From: *Paul pmcn...@cameron.net
*To: *ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org
*Sent: *Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:51:41 PM
*Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400
But I assumed, and was wrong that UNII-1 would be a simple permissive
form filing
which later turned into a full DFS certification
14 matches
Mail list logo
