On 8/14/18 10:04 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
> Unless you are attempting to do make a 'wireless wire' pre-configured
> PtP link in which case the 2-pac doesn't go far enough.
>
2Pac is considered one of the greatest rappers of all time.
___
Ubnt_users
On 8/13/18 09:41, RickG wrote:
> With respect, we don't know everything about the lawsuit. Also, I'd bet
> if the shoe were on the other foot, another manufacturer would sue a WISP.
I presume you've read the suit to make that claim?
On 8/13/18 7:41 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
>
> Ben Moore and James Craig. This is my request to Ubiquity to make a BOLD
> statement in some way that shows your commitment to the WISP community and
> your appreciation to those of us that have stuck by your side through years
> of "soon GPS",
On 8/12/18 11:01 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> People didn’t buy. Move on. Good months and bad. Don’t like it? Stop
> investing. Any other questions?
>
Previous quarter: We'll see at least $20 million in this sector by next
quarter!
This quarter: Uh, actually we didn't see any of that money, but
On 3/23/18 7:03 AM, alex phillips wrote:
> Can those who use AF11 and are able to establish a link a 10x reliably
> please share your link information?
>
> Distance, Dish and power settings.
Match your license. Don't randomly increase power, 11GHz travels a long
way and you can easily
On 4/16/17 5:00 PM, J Portman wrote:
> 1024QAM with MIMO. They claim 1.3 gig each direction on 56MHZ channel.
That's the marketing aggregate number, divide by two for capacity in
each direction.
~Seth
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
On 4/15/17 2:29 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> not trying to be anal even in your statement there is a 'as long as'
>
> There is no such 'as long as' requirement with the B11 sync.
So the back to back requirement that say setting up a PMP450 synce'd
cluster has so that a subscriber can't
On 4/15/17 12:46 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Can we do that today with FDD ? or the other party is going to get their
> panties in tbe bunch because their radio can hear your radio ?
Yes. Their radio CAN NOT hear your radio, even if they were pointed
facing into each other. It's impossible.
On 4/15/17 7:17 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> In case of Mimosa, you are actually getting something that has not existed
> before in the Licensed Radio world...
> Their radios don't care if they can hear each other.. and they will still
> operate, co-exist
> exactly how gps sync, channel reuse
On 4/14/17 5:09 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> I would love to be more 'educated' in this matter...
>
> How exactly is this achieved in real world ?
> I have been told that if another operator is using that channel & polarity, I
> cannot use it in the other direction...
>
> So, technically it is
On 4/14/17 3:18 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> and BTW, in regards to Mimosa B11 they get a pass for being a channel
> hog... because they also allow you to reuse the channel in a different
> direction due to GPS Sync capabilities .. yes it does not help if you are
> not using non Mimosa
On 4/13/17 12:48, J Portman wrote:
> ETSI allows 112MHZ channels. FCC limits to 80. BUT, if your equipment
> supports it, you can license two adjacent bands of 80 for 160MHZ channels.
Danger... do not think of it as a 160MHz channel. The FCC requires
individual carriers per channel, so you CAN
On 9/30/16 6:22 PM, Scotty Rice wrote:
> If you are trying to use a password longer than eight character try
> using just the first eight characters. The af24 only uses up to eight
> characters
What year are we in again?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
On 9/15/16 7:45 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Yes, Seth.
>
> But these are not "High / Low" radios...
> They use both channels for TX & RX ... Please correct me if I am wrong.
I thought there was talk about how it had a field adjustable diplexer
(which was a thing Exalt touted for single-unit
On 9/15/16 10:08, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> 1) Are the AF11x going to have 'sync' capability so that the channel
> freq can be reused by another AF11x pointing in a different direction ?
That's not really a problem with high/low microwave. I don't know where
people are getting the idea that it is
On 12/10/14, 20:16, Blair Davis wrote:
AirPrism was/is supposed to return to us the benefits, (adjacent channel
rejection, improved sensitivity), of the original dual superheterodyne
Hermes I and Intersil Prism II chipsets as opposed to the current direct
conversion Atheros chipsets.
I don't
On 12/9/14, 11:32, Ty Featherling wrote:
Oh there is a word.. and as usual the word is 'Soon'.
I think soon is the new it's on the boat.
~Seth
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
On 12/2/14, 5:34 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
However, I also remember all of us bitching about AC being a Java app
and not having a web UI for our phones and other devices. When Ben
Moore said that we would not have to worry about that in the next
version I kind of thought about a hosted
On 12/2/14, 8:52, Daniel Peoples wrote:
Yes, but we both know that the epmp doesn't support this, the 450 does.
Are you referring to CNS Server?
~Seth
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
On 12/1/14, 10:04, Matt Hoppes wrote:
I'm the last person in the world to recommend a TS to anyone
That said... have you ever had a WBH SA take a hit? If so, what, if
anything did it also do to your switch ports?
Shorting the switch port when the SA takes a hit doesn't seem like a
wise
On 12/1/14, 10:47, Josh Luthman wrote:
Why? You should always use HV.
On the non-GigE WB models like the 444 some people prefer a low clamping
voltage on the data pairs not carrying POE voltage vs. the POE pairs
which have a higher clamping voltage.
I use the GigE HV because it's one part
On 12/1/14, 12:34, Josh Luthman wrote:
Waste of time in the licensed world. They all perform as they
advertise. Modulation * channel size = megabits per second. Price
varies, GUI varies, support varies. Go SAF!
It was my understanding that there would be no math.
~Seth
On 12/1/14, 13:20, Adair Winter wrote:
I just don't see how this can be true... Most people can't make a VPN
work as it is how the hell am I supposed to depend on this to work if
it's not INSIDE my network?
Why aren't all of your radios open to the internet? You're obviously
doing it wrong.
On 12/1/14, 16:44, Kees H wrote:
Why would I waste public ips on my radios, so ubnt can have control of my
radios? Don't they know ARIN is running out of IPv4 addresses?
But it's CLOUD.
~Seth
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
On 12/1/14, 13:35, Mike Hammett wrote:
I don't know how anyone could read their target market this badly.
But are we really their target market?
~Seth
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
On 12/1/14, 6:14 PM, Tom Fadgen wrote:
I am sure glad that I own my business; and that said, as a business
owner I look to make choices from those available; not cry over what is not!
One thing is going to solve this problem, the one with UBNT not listing
to their customers and providing a lot
On 11/2/14, 4:20 PM, Paul wrote:
So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought will
not certify because of hardware problems?
No, he said they have a history of not certifying everything and thus a
risk of such a situation. The PowerBridge M5 for example.
~Seth
27 matches
Mail list logo
