stable. Probably and maybe I'm wrong, the main implications using the dev
version is that some feature will be changed at some moment later.
Luís
On Sex, 2015-05-08 at 17:17 +0200, Johan Nilsson wrote:
How unstable are the development version 2.9?
2015-05-08 16:58 GMT+02:00 Luis Ferreira
How unstable are the development version 2.9?
2015-05-08 16:58 GMT+02:00 Luis Ferreira lferreira7...@gmail.com:
It seems http://qgis.org/ubuntugis-nightly-release is offline. [image:
:)]
Use the development version.
http://qgis.org/ubuntugis-nightly
Luís
On Sex, 2015-05-08 at 17:19
versions at the
same time without VM overhead.
Enjoy,
Alex
On 01/09/2013 12:54 PM, Johan Nilsson wrote:
But aren't where a risk that a newer version download package, that the
older version don't use and in that process uninstall the older package
that the older version need?
2013/1/9
An Elementary questions about ubuntugis PPAs. Is it possible to have
separated installations of Ubuntugis-unstable and Ubuntugis-testing? Or is
it simplest to create a virtuall-machine and run it separated?
Cheers
2013/1/9 Rashad M mohammedrasha...@gmail.com
Hi All,
I dont weather you are
in ubuntu-testing is grass70, grass70-dev. but if grass70 is
said to replace grass then only the last installed will be taken.
Maybe other in the list have better answers :)
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Johan Nilsson joni8...@gmail.com wrote:
An Elementary questions about ubuntugis PPAs
