Hi,
I took liberty to forward opinion about PPA naming from GRASS ML. The
name for unstable PPA is simply confusing (moreover with combination
of testing PPA used for experimental packages - especially for Debian
users). Could be that I missed discussion about PPA naming, anyway
current names do
Hi Martin,
Little clarification for the non-expert lurkers like myself, are you
suggesting that the naming order should be as follows?
unstable --> testing --> stable
... which would match the Debian policy found here:
https://www.debian.org/releases/
Daniel
On 2016-09-16 8:37 AM, M
I'm one of the guys who was commenting on the confusion. Someone
commented that the naming is in keeping with Ubuntu policy. Which
probably for the Sys Admin crowd is perfect. We've got a weird blend of
Users who want software BUT (and I didn't up until this last thread)
understand the reasonin
from my perspective it should be (which will completely break policy on
several fronts)
Testing/unstable -> Fresh/Stable/Current -> Older Releases.
I don't know how the naming would need to be. I hesitate to suggest
because I'm advocating breaking with a standard on Two different
Distros. I
I'm in favor of removing testing and adding "experimental" instead.
This is closer to the actual way we use the ppa.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Randal Hale <
rjh...@northrivergeographic.com> wrote:
> from my perspective it should be (which will completely break policy on
> several fronts)
-- Original Message -- Subject: Re: [Ubuntu] Fwd: [GRASS-dev]
ubuntu gis policy Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:08:33 -0400 To: Ubuntu From:
Randal Hale
I'm one of the guys who was commenting on the confusion. Someone
commented that the naming is in keeping with Ubuntu policy.
Hi,
2016-09-16 15:45 GMT+02:00 Micha Silver :
> "Experimental" (=Debian testing) --> "Current" (=Debian unstable) -->
> "Legacy" (=Debian stable)
AFAIK, Debian toolchains is: Experimental -> Unstable -> Testing -> Stable
So:
"Experimental" (=Debian experimental) --> "Current" (=Debian
unstable/
-- Original Message -- Subject: Re: [Ubuntu] Fwd: [GRASS-dev]
ubuntu gis policy Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:48:56 +0200 To: Micha
Silver, Randal Hale, Ubuntu From: Martin Landa
Hi,
2016-09-16 15:45 GMT+02:00 Micha Silver :
"Experimental" (=Debian testing) --> "
On 09/16/2016 03:45 PM, Micha Silver wrote:
> Randal Hale
>> I'm one of the guys who was commenting on the confusion. Someone
>> commented that the naming is in keeping with Ubuntu policy. Which
>> probably for the Sys Admin crowd is perfect. We've got a weird blend
>> of Users who want software BU
+1 to renaming testing to experimental.
On 09/16/2016 04:23 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
I'm in favor of removing testing and adding "experimental" instead.
This is closer to the actual way we use the ppa.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Randal Hale <
rjh...@northrivergeographic.com> wrote:
On 09/16/2016 05:29 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 09/16/2016 03:45 PM, Micha Silver wrote:
Randal Hale
I'm one of the guys who was commenting on the confusion. Someone
commented that the naming is in keeping with Ubuntu policy. Which
probably for the Sys Admin crowd is perfect. We've got
On 09/16/2016 07:14 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
> On 09/16/2016 05:29 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 09/16/2016 03:45 PM, Micha Silver wrote:
>>> Randal Hale
I'm one of the guys who was commenting on the confusion. Someone
commented that the naming is in keeping with Ubuntu policy.
12 matches
Mail list logo
