On 6/12/2011 2:40 AM, Isaac Porat wrote:
Hi
My comments were not a criticism of at-spi but rather the need were possible
to unify accessibilities standard across platforms for the simple reason that
if software vendors have to worry about one accessibility stack it is better
than two or three
Hi
My comments were not a criticism of at-spi but rather the need were
possible to unify accessibilities standard across platforms for the
simple reason that if software vendors have to worry about one
accessibility stack it is better than two or three, as Linux as very
small user based it is
On 06/07/2011 03:36 AM, Isaac Porat wrote:
Hi
I was asking the same question a couple of years ago. My
understanding after looking a bit into the issue is that IBM consulted
at the time key people in accessibility in Linux (there still some
minutes of these meetings) to make both interfaces
Hi
I was asking the same question a couple of years ago. My understanding
after looking a bit into the issue is that IBM consulted at the time key
people in accessibility in Linux (there still some minutes of these
meetings) to make both interfaces as close as possible which as
indicated it
I guess IBM needed a neutral place to dump the interface definitions.
In theory it would be possible to implement iaccessible2 on linux, but the
inter process communication of it would have to be replaced and all that is
hosted as interface files on the linux foundation website can only be used w
