Here is a contact sheet of all submissions.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/EdgyProposals/Summary_18JULY2006
Note that I kept a few of the logo designs out
as they are so similar that the variations were
not even visible on the contact sheet.
Keep the variations such that they are appare
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 22:31 -0400, jmak wrote:
> Thanks for the comments. Tomorrow, I will change the black to
> something else. I am going to make a few color variations.
If I might ask, can we postpone the colour variations until
a little further down the road? Colour is a minor tweak.
We nee
On 7/18/06, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/18/06, jmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a couple of splash improvisations. More comes later.
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkJmakProposals
>
> What do you think?
>
> J. Mak
> --
Both very nice :)
I would love to see the second
Wow, there is a _lot_ of nice work there
The thing that really stands out for me is the Usplash (I assume
that's what it is) withthe cool shinny logo like Jmak's one and the
SVG clone I made...
I can't say purple makes me excstatic :P, but hey, we're still proposing
On 7/18/06, Viper550 <[EMAIL
On 7/18/06, jmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here is a couple of splash improvisations. More comes later.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkJmakProposals
What do you think?
J. Mak
--
Both very nice :)
I would love to see the second one with another tan instead of the
black - the 'hilll' is
Today, I worked on a new look and feel for Kubuntu overall:
http://wiki.kubuntu.org/Artwork/Incoming/Kubuntu-Edgy-Ideas
(look on the bottom)
Viper550
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Hi,
Here is a couple of splash improvisations. More comes later.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkJmakProposals
What do you think?
J. Mak
--
http://jozmak.googlepages.com/
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
Hi all,
Yeah, I am beating my head against the wiki door :-) eventually I will
even like it!
Here is a page that made with some interesting ideas for edgy...
http://wiki.kubuntu.org/Artwork/Incoming/Kubuntu-Edgy-Ideas
Have fun! Feel free to edit that page and add your o
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 02:16 +0200, Niklas Weidel wrote:
> I've spent a long weekend on my slow laptop, but I have some stuff to
> show for it on the wiki, which I've finally gotten to grips with! Feel
> free to feedback.
>
> First of all, I've added a page of my own, where I've now put up two
> ne
Hi all,
Yeah, I am beating my head against the wiki door :-) eventually I
will even like it!
Here is a page that made with some interesting ideas for edgy...
http://wiki.kubuntu.org/Artwork/Incoming/Kubuntu-Edgy-Ideas
Have fun! Feel free to edit that page and add your own stuff
(changing
Troy James Sobotka wrote:
This is why the proposal phase is important!
At Paris it wasn't precisely clear that Mr. Shuttleworth was
hoping to resume where "Dapper" direction left off. This is
now clearer.
Thank you for taking the time to comment, we shall steer accordingly.
So folks, ta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Troy James Sobotka:
> On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 16:58 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
>> 1. The Art Council should not be responsible for granting Ubuntu
>> membership, because the risk is that the community won't get to know new
>> members or hear about g
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 16:58 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
> 1. The Art Council should not be responsible for granting Ubuntu
> membership, because the risk is that the community won't get to know new
> members or hear about good work being done in the art area, and there
> is a risk of less consisten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
* Troy James Sobotka:
> On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 09:49 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
>> It seems to me that a representative "council" can be a good thing for
>> the art team because art decisions can sometimes be difficult to come to
>> a consensus on.
On 7/17/06, Troy James Sobotka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have limited this message to the folks who are actively
contributing to keep the mail down on the main mailing
list.
Right now, the direction that all of the work is going is
tremendous. I would like to give a form of a weekly update
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 12:41 +0100, Joao Inacio wrote:
> - I think a dark background is nicer than a lighter one, though the
> 4th one may be a bit too dark.
Tonal issues are easily and quickly dealt with once
a guiding direction is chosen. Don't get too fussy about
the small details just yet.
O
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 09:49 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
> It seems to me that a representative "council" can be a good thing for
> the art team because art decisions can sometimes be difficult to come to
> a consensus on. However it is important to be careful about designating
> the competence of th
PS: Sorry, I had to have a second look ;)I think the 3rd one is clearly better than the second, because I can't really have shadow around this glass plate.It gives the impression that the scene is not properly lighted or the glass is not polished.
In the 3rd (and 6th), the light is refracted in the
Wow.I like the second and the last (6th) one the best, although I'm having a hard time trying to decide if the second or the third one is better.The dark one is too dark for me.The shadow on the fifth looks a bit strange. I am expecting an object to cast the shadow, so this confuses the brain a bit
On 7/18/06, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have just added 5 more compositional alternatives - hope they can
give people some ideas
On 7/17/06, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This style is based loosely on the Dapper Splash, It uses a glossy
> Ubuntu logo that still needs a fair bit of perfe
Yaaah, nice. Can you lighten up the gloss (on the top) and the glow (bottom) a bit? On the splash screen, the "ubuntu" looks nearly monochrome. Which would be very pitiful if it staid that way ;)Generally, the colors are working very well for me.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu
Awesome work!The darker one (v1) seems to look better to me, while the others look rather flat. But that might be due to the missing strong gradients in the shapes' stroke lines. Is this intentional?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
* Troy James Sobotka:
{snip}
> The Art Council will become an extremely important
> are of the Ubuntu project, so I would encourage everyone
> and anyone who has interest to apply.
{snip}
> PS: A brief set of questions and answers can b
23 matches
Mail list logo
