> I PREFERE THE SIMPLICITY AND THE LOOK OF GNOME...
> BUT SOME FUNCTIONS OF KDE ARE GOOD.
THANKS, MESSAGE RECEIVED LOUD AND CLEAR :|
THIS EMAIL WILL SELF-DESTRUCT IN 5 ... 4 ... 3 ...
;)
\d
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> IMHO brown is one of the ugliest colours. I'm sorry but it reminds me of
> several bad things. Please don't decide to make a brown theme, orange is
> ways better.
I'm sorry to bother the list responding to this, but I feel
t
Hi Sylvain!
Can you turn off the caps-button please?
Your e-mails are making me nervous. :)
- Andreas
sylvain marc skrev:
> SORRY IF MY FIRTS POST IS TOO BIG - I TRY TO CANCEL IT LIKE IT WAS
> EXPLAIN HERE :
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/confirm/ubuntu-art/937276445103c0ebf02ae929dedb62b8
On 22/11/2007, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 22 November 2007 16:22:28 Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 November 2007 15:59:35 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Any progress on official guidelines? That page states that the next
> > > meeting is 1st
SORRY IF MY FIRTS POST IS TOO BIG - I TRY TO CANCEL IT LIKE IT WAS EXPLAIN
HERE :
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/confirm/ubuntu-art/937276445103c0ebf02ae929dedb62b826c82c69
..
I LIKE http://mandarancio.deviantart.com/art/Minimal-perception-67892707
AND http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/M
VERRY GOOD ICONES
CAN YOU GIVE ME IT IN "*.tar.bz2"
THANK YOU
2007/11/22, Martino Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello, my name is Martino. I'm the developper of the Minimal-perception
> icon themes.
> Following Cory's invite, I am willing to collaborate with the artwork
> team.
> My work is sti
I PREFERE THE SIMPLICITY AND THE LOOK OF GNOME...
BUT SOME FUNCTIONS OF KDE ARE GOOD.
2007/11/22, Donn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Afterstep was good. Very good. But then again anything seemed
> > magnificent compare to the likes of twm. That default background was
> > epilepsy inducing.
> Ha, you
IMHO brown is one of the ugliest colours. I'm sorry but it reminds me of
several bad things. Please don't decide to make a brown theme, orange is
ways better.
On Nov 22, 2007 10:27 PM, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Seeing as Kenneth says that this is the time to suggest ideas to be
Who wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 9:35 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Nodoka is a unnessary fork of Murrine and shouldnt be used. Everything
>> done in Nodoka can be done in Murrine or is just a couple of added lines
>> of code.
>>
>
> You might well be right, but it seems the Fed
Pc and Trash icon are hard to identify with their function. I like the idea
of the folders, matte colour with easy to recognize emblems.
2007/11/22, Lasse Havelund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Looks nice. I don't like the MyBook-like external HDD icon, but other
> than that, they're pretty cool. The q
On Nov 22, 2007 9:35 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nodoka is a unnessary fork of Murrine and shouldnt be used. Everything
> done in Nodoka can be done in Murrine or is just a couple of added lines
> of code.
You might well be right, but it seems the Fedora guys thought a fork
was neces
Looks nice. I don't like the MyBook-like external HDD icon, but other
than that, they're pretty cool. The question is, would it fit in?
- Lasse
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 20:55 +0100, Martino Ferrari wrote:
> Hello, my name is Martino. I'm the developper of the
> Minimal-perception icon themes.
> Foll
I'm agree with Who again. Agree in all points, but I want to add one
more. Shinnyness should be on app icons. Why? Simple, apps should be easy to
recognize, should be distinct than the other kind of icons (mimetypes,
devices, etc.).
Mimetypes should be matte with some drawings inside, to recognize
I'll chime in here quickly as I invited Martino to join the list.
I ran across his set on GNOME-Look and thought they were really good.
Very early in development but shows alot of promise.
I showed them to kwwii and he liked the set as well. I agree that for
Ubuntu's purpose more color is needed
Who wrote:
> Nodoka, is a nice theme engine to use
> http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Nodoka+GTK%2B+Engine?content=64604
>
> So, let's have a discussion about it - what do people think?
>
Nodoka is a unnessary fork of Murrine and shouldnt be used. Everything
done in Nodoka can be done i
Hi all,
Seeing as Kenneth says that this is the time to suggest ideas to be
taken in to account when the final artwork direction is decided I
would like to start some discussion of the merits of using a matte
theme (with small glossy elements/highlights) for the next release of
Ubuntu
I'd love an
I'm agree with Who. Nice icons, but we have to take advantage of colours.
It's a powerful way to add usability, and Ubuntu icons should be coloured.
2007/11/22, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Those are really nice - do you have svgs of them, I'm interested in
> adding colour to them :)
>
> On Nov 22,
Those are really nice - do you have svgs of them, I'm interested in
adding colour to them :)
On Nov 22, 2007 7:55 PM, Martino Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, my name is Martino. I'm the developper of the Minimal-perception icon
> themes.
> Following Cory's invite, I am willing to colla
Hello, my name is Martino. I'm the developper of the Minimal-perception icon
themes.
Following Cory's invite, I am willing to collaborate with the artwork team.
My work is still in progress and there have already been many improvements
with respect to the online version (
http://gnome-look.org/con
> Afterstep was good. Very good. But then again anything seemed
> magnificent compare to the likes of twm. That default background was
> epilepsy inducing.
Ha, you are right there!
\d
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Thursday 22 November 2007 16:22:28 Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> On Thursday 22 November 2007 15:59:35 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>
>
> > Any progress on official guidelines? That page states that the next
> > meeting is 1st of November... :-)
Lol, reading back in my response to your original
On Thursday 22 November 2007 15:59:35 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> Any progress on official guidelines? That page states that the next meeting
> is 1st of November... :-)
Sorry about that. I was trying to figure out how to add the new info to the
included table at the top of the wiki pag
On 12/11/2007, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Sunday 11 November 2007 00:10:26 Who wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Does sabdfl still read this list? Some of these questions here may
> > only be able to be answered by him (or kwwii - are you employed to
> > work on this at th
On 22/11/2007, at 5:41 PM, Donn wrote:
>> I think another big turn off for us Linux / FreeBSD users is the fact
>> that KDE is a direct rip off of Windows, and that's not fun,
> I don't grok this. How is the essential layout and set of concepts
> between
> Gnome, KDE and Windows any different?
24 matches
Mail list logo
