Cory K. wrote:
>
> Actually, I can simply simlink these. So no need for actual files.
>
*Actually these are not the same as the nm icons* ,
They look the same But they are done differently, specifically for
notify-osd Bubbles.
simlinks to the nm-signal 48px png icons dont give a good result bec
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:40:22 Cory K. wrote:
> Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 June 2009 10:31:00 Cory K. wrote:
> >> Andrew SB wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cory K. wrote:
> So what's your next move? Do you wanna try to go for a 0.44 upload to
> REVU or does kww
mac_v wrote:
> Hi,
> Just uploaded the Wireless notify-osd icons.
>
> Due to the distinct appearance of the Bubbles , Simple exporting of the
> svg , will not show how the final icon looks , Hence I'v posted
> screenshots of the icons in action.
>
> I'v done them in color , Kwwii says that the icon
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 June 2009 10:31:00 Cory K. wrote:
>
>> Andrew SB wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cory K. wrote:
>>>
So what's your next move? Do you wanna try to go for a 0.44 upload to
REVU or does kwwii wanna take this on? (as we've cha
Hi,
Just uploaded the Wireless notify-osd icons.
Due to the distinct appearance of the Bubbles , Simple exporting of the
svg , will not show how the final icon looks , Hence I'v posted
screenshots of the icons in action.
I'v done them in color , Kwwii says that the icons can be in color *if*
brea
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 10:31:00 Cory K. wrote:
> Andrew SB wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cory K. wrote:
> >> So what's your next move? Do you wanna try to go for a 0.44 upload to
> >> REVU or does kwwii wanna take this on? (as we've chatted before about
> >> it. just had to give him
Andrew SB wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cory K. wrote:
>
>> So what's your next move? Do you wanna try to go for a 0.44 upload to
>> REVU or does kwwii wanna take this on? (as we've chatted before about
>> it. just had to give him the go. GO!) :P
>>
>
>
> Well, there's some work
>
> But then the icon wouldnt look good :(
> It would become too simple. Since already the paper is flat.
>
> That is why *staying away from the paper* [as much as possible] would be
> better , *so that icon could have a better design* .
>
>
> Cheers,
> mac_v
I completely agree.
We should stay a
