daniel planas armangue wrote:
>> @Daniel: I'd like you to stop work on anything new and examine your
>> current work. Make sure it fits the above criteria.
>>
>>
>
>
> ok. I think my icons are fine in general but should be some fixes in small
> resolutions,
>
> I will review the mail and nav
> @Daniel: I'd like you to stop work on anything new and examine your
> current work. Make sure it fits the above criteria.
>
>
> -Cory K.
ok. I think my icons are fine in general but should be some fixes in small
resolutions,
I will review the mail and navigate butons series
--
ubuntu-a
I also want it noted where derivative icons came from if it's based on
another. It's very important for licensing.
-Cory K.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
New issue. I think we're rushing a bit. Things are missing (as noted
before) and I think we're not taking the time to ensure that the look is
consistent.
Sebastien has set the bar. As I see it, things need to be in line with
his look and feel. We cannot simply take from another set and use it
anym
On *all* of Daniels current submissions they are missing the "category"
formatting on the artwork layer. Without that, "actions/whatever-*" the
icons will not build correctly. The "palette" layer was also left in as
well as not vacuuming the defs. I took most of the icons from 150k to
50k. Big diff
