Andrew SB wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Cory K. wrote:
>
>> This is mostly a question for AndrewSB.
>>
>> I'm wondering if there's any reason why a BZR branch set up for Debian
>> packaging couldn't be considered an upstream? (as this is a native
>> package and we do it in Studio)
>>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Cory K. wrote:
> This is mostly a question for AndrewSB.
>
> I'm wondering if there's any reason why a BZR branch set up for Debian
> packaging couldn't be considered an upstream? (as this is a native
> package and we do it in Studio)
>
> If there is nothing glaring
This is mostly a question for AndrewSB.
I'm wondering if there's any reason why a BZR branch set up for Debian
packaging couldn't be considered an upstream? (as this is a native
package and we do it in Studio)
If there is nothing glaring, I'm inclined to merge the two to reduce
some of the redund
