On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 18:40 +0200, supermod wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 01:11 +0100, Adam wrote:
> > i dont like to show osx as an example but look at this pic:
> > http://www.macupdate.com/images/screens/uploaded/26915_scr.png
> > look at the details, the timeline at the bottom, the glassy ba
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 01:11 +0100, Adam wrote:
> i dont like to show osx as an example but look at this pic:
> http://www.macupdate.com/images/screens/uploaded/26915_scr.png
> look at the details, the timeline at the bottom, the glassy bars etc,
> its all impossible in gtk. Cimi coded the rgba sup
> At the current state I would bet on three (or more years) until things are
> really done. Trust me, I was involved in the kde 3 to 4 transition and it has
> taken more time than planned.
>
> --
> Ken
>
so how are we gonna compete with others who already have the features
what gtk develope
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 01:41:01 Ryan Prior wrote:
> GTK is becoming a dinosaur, and the GTK developers realize this to some
> extent - that's why they're allowing for API breakages with GTK 3, which
> should be coming out within a year or two. Hopefully they break them enough
> that we can r
GTK is becoming a dinosaur, and the GTK developers realize this to some
extent - that's why they're allowing for API breakages with GTK 3, which
should be coming out within a year or two. Hopefully they break them enough
that we can really get a lot done. :-)
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Adam <
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 01:26:55 Adam wrote:
> > Implementing rgba support in gtk is a tricky issue. I openly offered
> > to
> > sponsor someone to implement this and nobody would do it. In my
> > experience it
> > is almost impossible to change gtk, even if you are willing to pay for
> > it.
>
> Implementing rgba support in gtk is a tricky issue. I openly offered
> to
> sponsor someone to implement this and nobody would do it. In my
> experience it
> is almost impossible to change gtk, even if you are willing to pay for
> it.
>
> --
> Ken
>
does it mean that gnomes experience s
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 01:11:07 Adam wrote:
> i dont like to show osx as an example but look at this pic:
> http://www.macupdate.com/images/screens/uploaded/26915_scr.png
> look at the details, the timeline at the bottom, the glassy bars etc,
> its all impossible in gtk. Cimi coded the rgba
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 00:50:28 Michael Stephenson wrote:
> I can't see how you could use up some of the wasted space without adding
> redundant buttons, perhaps making the control buttons central would make it
> appear as if less space was being wasted? I'd need to see a mockup of a
> bette
i dont like to show osx as an example but look at this pic:
http://www.macupdate.com/images/screens/uploaded/26915_scr.png
look at the details, the timeline at the bottom, the glassy bars etc,
its all impossible in gtk. Cimi coded the rgba support for gtk, did they
implemented it?
signature.asc
>
> The gnome panel simply needs help...probably won't ever happen, just like
> major gtk changes...too
So they dont even plan on improving gtk?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
I can't see how you could use up some of the wasted space without adding
redundant buttons, perhaps making the control buttons central would make it
appear as if less space was being wasted? I'd need to see a mockup of a
better totem to be convinced it needs work.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 00:33:38 Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2008 00:30:50 Michael Stephenson wrote:
> > 2008/11/4 Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > rhythmbox and nautilus or totem, or openoffice which is the ugliest
> > > thing ever.
> >
> > What do people expect from t
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 00:33 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2008 00:30:50 Michael Stephenson wrote:
> > 2008/11/4 Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > rhythmbox and nautilus or totem, or openoffice which is the ugliest
> > > thing ever.
> >
> > What do people expect from to
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 00:30:50 Michael Stephenson wrote:
> 2008/11/4 Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > rhythmbox and nautilus or totem, or openoffice which is the ugliest
> > thing ever.
>
> What do people expect from totem? its a media player, it has a viewing
> window play/pause, skip forwa
2008/11/4 Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> rhythmbox and nautilus or totem, or openoffice which is the ugliest thing
> ever.
>
>
What do people expect from totem? its a media player, it has a viewing
window play/pause, skip forwards and skip backwards and volume, how do you
jazz that up without adding
i totally agree.. the new murrine engines gives us an awsome tool, but
it wont help applications like rhythmbox and nautilus or totem, or
openoffice which is the ugliest thing ever. I know its more like suns
fault or the gnome developers. gnome doesnt have any improvements at
all. its like one more
Doesn't this boil down to bugging the makers of Gnome? Where are the
improvements that we should be seeing? Windows 7 is already on its way here
and Gnome has the same old stuff. Sure, some updates in Intrepid, but
nothing really special. It all comes down to coding, in reality. Perhaps
it's our jo
Hear hear; a lot of the talk/whining about theming engines boils down to a
desire to put more lipstick on the pigs that are Nautilus, Rhythmbox,
Firefox, etc.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 12:00 +, Bharat Varma wrote:
>
> Neil Patel posted some flickr mockups of a possible Ubuntu desktop
> about an
> year ago, using an engine called 'Avant', which was based off the
> Murrine
> build at the time. I am not sure if this progressed any further from
> those
> mo
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:49 AM, José Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Check this: https://launchpad.net/~dx-team
> They've made a team with masclow, Neil Patel, Ted Gould and mpt.
> MacSLow and Patel are (along with smspillaz) the kings of the pimp!
> Let's see what crazy things happen in this t
Check this: https://launchpad.net/~dx-team
They've made a team with masclow, Neil Patel, Ted Gould and mpt.
MacSLow and Patel are (along with smspillaz) the kings of the pimp!
Let's see what crazy things happen in this team
--
José Luis Ricón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubun
Neil Patel posted some flickr mockups of a possible Ubuntu desktop about an
year ago, using an engine called 'Avant', which was based off the Murrine
build at the time. I am not sure if this progressed any further from those
mockups. The thread on Ubuntu Forums is
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthrea
23 matches
Mail list logo
