sascha brossmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/1/06, Pascal Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Making branding icon sets is a lot of work, which is just going to> be seen in that one distribution.as far as i understand it would not be restricted to be used just inubuntu, will it? though, given the
On 3/1/06, Pascal Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Making branding icon sets is a lot of work, which is just going to
> be seen in that one distribution.
as far as i understand it would not be restricted to be used just in
ubuntu, will it? though, given the, erm... disputable >;-> sense and
unde
just to add my support
these icons rock
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperIcons
were going up against vista/osx
(http://www.activewin.com/reviews/previews/vista5308/Sidebar%20Properties.JPG)
(http://macpro.freeshell.org/misc/OSX-Desktop.jpg)
we've gotta have a pro desktop look - the stock gnome ones
I could suggest what tango uses: a disk and an arrow pointing to it.
El mié, 01-03-2006 a las 18:05 +, Olafur Arason escribió:
> I like the concept of saving disk or mabey saving to a folder rather
> than saving to a diskette. So a really cool save icon would be a
> arrow to a folder, because
Op wo, 01-03-2006 te 17:41 +0200, schreef Ville Sokk:
> The icons look great, but you just can't imagine how sad it makes me that
> it was made by some hired designer. This makes me feel that Ubuntu is
> leaving the thinking of Linux and going towards Windows like Linspire and
> Xandros who I reall
I like the concept of saving disk or mabey saving to a folder rather
than saving to a diskette. So a really cool save icon would be a
arrow to a folder, because open is opening a folder.
Olafur Arason
On 2/28/06, Julian Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw the preview of the new
> I just have to my own "OMFG that's some seriously cool icons!" to this
> debate :-D
>
> While I to some part agree with klepas that this kind of development
> (sorta like the Novell XGL thing) is a bit frustrating - it also shows
> (again) how effective this approach is.
>
> I think it is really
I just have to my own "OMFG that's some seriously cool icons!" to this
debate :-D
While I to some part agree with klepas that this kind of development
(sorta like the Novell XGL thing) is a bit frustrating - it also shows
(again) how effective this approach is.
I think it is really great work, an
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:20:49 +0100
Julian Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw the preview of the new Dapper icon set Mark posted at
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperIcons .
> I have a few questions regarding these icons:
>
> Who made this set? I'm just curious.
> What license
These Icons
are great; also elegant. Far better than the dull Tango set.The best so far.J. Mak Julian Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,I just saw the preview of the new Dapper icon set Mark posted athttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperIcons . I have a
Hi,
I just saw the preview of the new Dapper icon set Mark posted at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperIcons .
I have a few questions regarding these icons:
Who made this set? I'm just curious.
What license will it be published under?
How can I contribute? My own Still Life is quite similar in style
11 matches
Mail list logo
