> The problem is the same for the psd file icon (attached): why putting a
> Photoshop logo? The user only has to know it is an image, with the psd
> extension. The photoshop logo is a nonsense here.
I was under the impression that a PSD file was a PhotoShop Document.
Is this not a proprietary form
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:44 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
> Vishnoo a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
> >>
> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
>
> >>>
