Re: [ubuntu-art] Split Backgrounds

2009-06-15 Thread Kenneth Wimer
Hi Thorsten, On Sunday 14 June 2009 10:59:56 Thorsten Wilms wrote: > Hi! > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Karmic/Backgrounds > is _long_ and growing. It's becoming too easy to trigger the wiki's so > called "surge protection" because of the many images. For example, if > you open one o

Re: [ubuntu-art] Split Backgrounds

2009-06-14 Thread Saleel Velankar
Thorsten Wilms wrote: > Hi! > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Karmic/Backgrounds > is _long_ and growing. It's becoming too easy to trigger the wiki's so > called "surge protection" because of the many images. For example, if > you open one of the full size links in a new tab while the p

Re: [ubuntu-art] Split Backgrounds

2009-06-14 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:37 +0200, Mads Rosendahl wrote: > But, shouldn't there also be a way to submit your work as both default > artwork and the extra package (Or is there already a blurred line > between the two)? It is a blurry line. Artwork submitted for default but not accepted as such wi

[ubuntu-art] Split Backgrounds

2009-06-14 Thread Mads Rosendahl
> I think the intro/rules/how-to section should be left where it is, to > replace the submissions sections with links to sub-pages: > * [Submissions for the default background] > * Submissions for the extra backgrounds package >* [Abstract] >* [Photos] > Any concerns or alternative propos

[ubuntu-art] Split Backgrounds

2009-06-14 Thread Thorsten Wilms
Hi! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Karmic/Backgrounds is _long_ and growing. It's becoming too easy to trigger the wiki's so called "surge protection" because of the many images. For example, if you open one of the full size links in a new tab while the page is still loading. I it wasn'