2008/10/25 Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 16:03 -0200, spg76 wrote:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
f-spot is solid, although I wonder if the photos should stand in front?
As I said before, we do not wanna stray so
spg76 wrote:
2008/10/25 Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 16:03 -0200, spg76 wrote:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
f-spot is solid, although I wonder if the photos
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 16:03 -0200, spg76 wrote:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
accessories-dictionary2 has appeal, but I think the perspective is too
wild / stands out too much.
The front of drive-optical2 is pretty good now. I think you should also
brighten the
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 16:03 -0200, spg76 wrote:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
f-spot is solid, although I wonder if the photos should stand in front?
As I said before, we do not wanna stray so far from the upstream look.
It's their
Joshua Booth wrote:
Can we *please* stray away from adding logos to the icons?
I can't say I'm for or against this. I think when it's done in a subtle
manner like Sebastian has (Apple and the Oxygen do this) done it's fine.
-Cory K.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
