Carey & Michael,
I will reply to both of you.
As per wiki, there is NO such thing as a 'State based LoCo', there is a
'State Community Council' if there is sufficient 'Local LoCo'
representatives to form one. A 'State representative' is then
appointed/elected to the ACC.
The role of the ACC is
Wow, that post is probably the most productive thing I've ever seen come out
of this team.
You're right about the whole "People don't need their hands held" attitude.
I've lost count of the amount of times I've seen the same leadership (err,
person) use that same responsibility shift for years now
Michael,
Your question about regional areas is a curly one, In Qld we have a
few regional areas Toowoomba, Rockhampton & Townsville that might have enough
users to setup a LoCo, I guess we should focus on state based loCo's in the 1st
instance so as not to disadvantage remote users.
my
Hi Andrew, and everyone else who wishes to take part in this
discussion.
I see you have put alot of thought into this and I applaud your
initiative in bringing this matter to the forefront again.
I don't have many comments to make at this time but the ones I do have
to make will probably ruffle a
A very well presented post.. I will contribute to this one I have read
all of the links ...
--
Scott Evans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-au mailing list
ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
Robert,
I pretty much agree with your observations. I guess I take the pragmatic
approach. I think most people would concur though, that the information
contained in https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats is little
more than a nod and a wink to the laws that exist (which the Ubuntu
co
LEADERSHIP and a ROADMAP
Prologue: 25th March, Melissa Draper (our team contact) was sent an
email outlining some of the following in detail. I am still awaiting
a reply (maybe she is on holidays), thus my reason for a public post
to the Ubuntu-au community. (I wish that she had replied so we cou
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 12:02 +1000, Martin Visser wrote:
> Barry,
>
>
> I am guessing you mean patents rather patterns. That said, I think you
> will find that those patents have not been enforced. They may have
> some standing, but I don't think any non-licence holder of media
> codecs and has be
Barry,
I am guessing you mean patents rather patterns. That said, I think you will
find that those patents have not been enforced. They may have some standing,
but I don't think any non-licence holder of media codecs and has been
subject to legal proceedings in Australia (at least publically).
(A
No. Haven't heard anything from the webmaster yet.
J
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:26 AM, AndrewG wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Has there been any developments on this issue?
>
> Andrew.
>
> On Mar 27, 10:45 am, James Beake wrote:
> > I wanted to put link here to a comment I made on ubuntu.org.au to draw
Hi James,
Has there been any developments on this issue?
Andrew.
On Mar 27, 10:45 am, James Beake wrote:
> I wanted to put link here to a comment I made on ubuntu.org.au to draw it o
> the attention of the Brisbane community but as far as I can tell the website
> only shows comments to logged i
11 matches
Mail list logo
