1. As an observer to this saga, I would back the sentiments viz. AndrewG's write up = quality. 2. I do wonder though if AndrewG is going to nom himself for Pres. of the ACC? 3. I wonder also if au has enough *nix users and a big enough subset of them running *buntu to staff an ACC, State and territory CC's and LoCo's? 4. On paper, this looks very nice, and in principle I agree that a new model needs to be rolled out for ubuntu-au, but practically I have reservations about its implementation. 5. Having said that, I think we should have a popularity con...- er, referendum with other proposed ideas for the restructuring of ubuntu-au and THEN have the winner go for the trial period. Second place can collect $50.
$0.02, Andrew Powter aka "nDR01d" On 12 April 2010 12:43, AndrewG <gande...@gmail.com> wrote: > LEADERSHIP and a ROADMAP > > Prologue: 25th March, Melissa Draper (our team contact) was sent an > email outlining some of the following in detail. I am still awaiting > a reply (maybe she is on holidays), thus my reason for a public post > to the Ubuntu-au community. (I wish that she had replied so we could > have made a joint post) > > > LEADERSHIP: From the correspondence that I have had with Melissa, she > informs me that > "The contact is not the dog's body nor is it the mastermind." > Further, "I'm responsible for allocating privileges as allowed to us > by Canonical. I'm the team /contact/. I'm the person who interfaces > between Canonical and the team members." > > So my conclusion is that the 'Team Contact' is NOT the team leader > (contrary to popular belief), but a 'Conduit' between Canonical, the > Community Council and the Ubuntu-au community. (and also that the Team > leader should convey the sentiment of the ubuntu-au community) > > Thus, Ubuntu-au is a collection of people with no leadership, a group > of individuals trying to further the goals set down in the wiki page > 'The Australian team focuses on distributing, advertising and > demonstrating Ubuntu within Australia' > > > I also asked Melissa the following > "What is your vision ?" > Her reply > "My vision is for a team that is constructive and contains people who > think up initiatives or support others rather than waiting for > orders." > My reply > "How do we encourage & support constructive people? > Some people need to be given guidance, in my experience there are > three types of people. > 1. Leaders: Those that inspire others to do great things > 2. Followers: Those that need inspiration to do great things. > 3. Others: They just don't give a damn about doing great things." > > > On March 8,9 & 11, there was some very robust threads on this mailing > list about Ubuntu-au Governance, Re-approval and the Website. > Now I'm not sure that these discussions achieved much as it has been > over one month and it seams that these issues remain unresolved. > > I think I can see why this is the case. > > 1. There seams to be a reluctance to change the status-quo. > 2. There is a fear about 'loss of control'. > 3. There is no clear process to bring about change to the Ubuntu-au > community. > 4. There is no 'leadership' to enable change to be achieved. > > In summary: 'Nobody is responsible for everything' or 'Everybody is > responsible for Everything' or 'Nobody is responsible for Nothing' > > "Change is the law of life and those who look only to the past or > present are certain to miss the future." > —John F. Kennedy > > > BIG PICTURE: > Currently there is a discussion with the Community Council > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-community/+bug/392986 > It talks about 'LoCo's are not "Lo" Enough' (Mark Shuttleworth has > even made comment) > and the concept of: > ReCo = Regional Community (for States and Provinces) > CoCo = Country Community (for Countries) > LoCo = Local Community (for Towns and Cities) > > The Ubuntu-au community is clearly a 'CoCo' not a 'LoCo' as we are > seperated by large distances, in cities and regions. > > If we accept the premise that the ubuntu-au community is made up of > smaller 'LoCo' around the country. > I.E. Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Perth, Hobart > > > *********************************************************************************************************** > PROPOSAL: I would propose that an "Australian Community Council"(ACC) > be created. (A Trial for 18 months) > Its members would be 1. Team-Contact 2. Web-master 3. 'LoCo' > representative(s) (7+-2 people total) > > *********************************************************************************************************** > (See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-au/council/structure for a summary > of models) > (See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-au/council/structure-detailed for > a detailed model of the ACC) > (These models have been created in collaboration, and are open to > further modification) > > The role of the ACC, is really one of "Advisory, Support & > Consultation", as the "Team contact" will still retain the role & > privileges. > > ADVANTAGES > 1. It gives the community some ownership in the process of running > the Ubuntu-au. > 2. It will bring forward 'leaders', which could be potential > successors for the 'Team contact' > 3. Spreading the load of leadership. (with 9 potential persons) > 4. An open transparent process. > 5. Authority to drive discussion and implementation. > 6. The decision making process, on a national level is simplified, it > is easier to make decisions with 9 (potentially) than it is with 40 in > an IRC meeting. > 7. An identifiable 'Contact' person for each City/Region. > There are many Teams in the wider Ubuntu community, that utilise a > council to share the leadership role eg. Georgia & Ohio > > DISADVANTAGES > 1. Elections. > 2. Structured. > 3. A Committee. > (These are not really disadvantages, but necessary evils to achieve > the outcomes of the ADVANTAGES) > > > > ROADMAP: Where do we go from here? > > **************************************************************************************************************** > I guess that I am asking YOU the community to see if YOU are in favour > of an 'Australian Community Council'? > > **************************************************************************************************************** > If this thread gets a favourable response, then the next thing to do > would be to call a poll and have the 'PROPOSAL' passed. > Then we could call for each City/Region to elect a representative to > the ACC. > > One response to this post could be: 'This is all great in theory, but > we don't have enough people to create an ACC.' > My response would be: 'Let's ask for interested persons to come > forward and nominate' (I know of three people that would be > interested) > > Finally, unless we have a 'Structure & Process' in place to create a > leadership team nobody will come forward. > The status-quo cannot continue and to move forward a leadership team > is required to motivate the community to do great things. > > RE-APPROVAL: > As our re-approval approaches, obviously my 'PROPOSAL' for the > creation of the ACC cannot be implemented. (if the community agrees) > We can say to the Ubuntu Community Council, "We are in the process of > creating an Australian Community Council, from our Regions/Cities" our > chances of re-approval will be greatly improved. > > > *********************************************************** > Are YOU in favour of an 'Australian Community Council'? > *********************************************************** > Those of you who want change, now is the time to speak-up. > > > Regards, > > Andrew G. > > > PS. Please read the detailed model at the wiki before replying to this > post. > Ref: wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoTeamLeader and wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoTeamHowto > > -- > ubuntu-au mailing list > ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au > -- To promote open standards on the web I'm only accepting documents in OpenDocument format. OpenDocument is a free and open format, and an ISO standard. Please visit http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument to get started with OpenDocument today. IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although my mother-in-law is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft: However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites then place in a warm oven for 40 minutes. Whisk briefly and let it stand for 2 hours before icing. Use Linux. This email has been sent via a carbon life form. <a href="http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=8118";><img src="IMAGE_LOCATION" alt="[FSF Associate Member]" width="88" height="31" /></a>
-- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
