David,
How about my two requirements:
1. Organising of the media library (renaming files/folders etc). (this
one I can live without)
2. 'Score' or 'Skip Count' tracking - In Banshee I have a smart
playlist which automatically ignores songs I skip frequently, so my
random playlist is generated fr
I've been using rhymthbox for ages and I think it almost hits all those
requirements
On 25/03/12 21:33, Paul Gear wrote:
My essential features:
* No-brainer Google-style filtering of playlist/collection. Amarok 2
lost me here: you have to write expressions instead of just typing
par
On 25/03/12 12:58, Jared Norris wrote:
> On 25 March 2012 12:29, Stephen Rees-Carter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With the impending switch back to Rhythmbox in 12.04, I was wondering
>> which media player everyone here prefers, and why?
>>
>> I find Banshee slow and clunky, but I really like the autom
On 25 March 2012 12:29, Stephen Rees-Carter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the impending switch back to Rhythmbox in 12.04, I was wondering
> which media player everyone here prefers, and why?
>
> I find Banshee slow and clunky, but I really like the automatic media
> organiser and the 'score' sorting.
Hi all,
With the impending switch back to Rhythmbox in 12.04, I was wondering
which media player everyone here prefers, and why?
I find Banshee slow and clunky, but I really like the automatic media
organiser and the 'score' sorting.
So I'm in two minds about switching back to Rhythmbox, since it
